[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images.jpg (11 KB, 275x183)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
Why you can't dump trash into volcano and then maybe throw dynamite in a capsule to churn the lava so trash goes under or something
Picrel is retarded
>>
>>16865726
We don't dump trash into a volcano for the same reasons why we don't burn trash anymore. Noxious fumes.
>>
>>16865726
Aside from bad smell, distance towards volcano with easily accessible lava, and maybe some regulations and personnel safety reason, why cant you?
>>
if it becomes mainstream, it risks setting off volcano erruptions, you are introducing instability into an already unstable system--something volcanologists would argue because it disturbs their environment of study, you spoil their models, etc and it could be very costly in the future for countries relying on such data
>>
>>16865728
Just dump chemicals that will react with fume chemicals and capture them into the volcano, it's fine if they're toxic as long as they don't evaporate, they'll just flow somewhere deep and get broken down by heat eventually or something

>>16865731
It will be fine, the amount of energy needed to impact an eruption is colossal, a bunch of trash and dynamite are less than a statistical error
>>
>>16865733
its not the energy, its the chaotic butterfly effect chaotic dynamics you introduce to their models, its a very valid economic argument to make btw after a major eruption, someone will surely find it convenient to blame whoever introduced garbage into a perfectly natural system
>>
>>16865726
Just dump it in the fucking ocean. Much cheaper and sidesteps all these problems.
>>
>>16865774
At this point why not just shoot it into space
>>
>>16865733
lava isn't a light fluid like water. even the least dense lavas are very dense. you drop shit on top of it it's just gonna sit there and burn. just use a furnace.
>>
>>16866149
That's why you drop dynamite in there to mix it up
>>
>>16865728
As opposed to the healthy life giving fumes that volcanos usually produce
>>
>>16865726
blue lava, a self admited freemasson told me, look it up, there's probably green lava too and all linds of colors lava, it's just that those will be rare
>>
>>16866287
Yes.
>>
>>16865726
How many volcanoes are near where you live?
>>
>>16865728
Lots of places do incinerate waste, better still if the waste heat is used for power and district heating. The harmful stuff can be filtered out of the fumes.
>>
Probably rude and offensive to the lord of the volcanoes. Dunno.
>>
Just dump it out the window
>>
>>16865726
>Why you can't dump trash into volcano
You can try. If this one do not erupt, then his brother will do it, as revenge on stupid mortals.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.