Is reality smooth
>>16868282no
>>16868282This is probably the most profound question I've ever seen a retarded frogposter ask. No, it's digital. We only observe analog because somehow our brains developed it. The world is scales of digital.
>>16868291Why are electron orbitals and everything quantum round. It all looks like balloons.
>>16868291>No, it's digital.
>>16868282it's undecidable.
>>16868307B-b-b-because my simulation god turned on heckin' anti-aliasing in this cool digital vidya game, ok???
>>16868311t. retard
>>16868282My ass is smooth
>>16868282No cause of black holes
>>16868405>t. retardGR assumes the universe is a smooth manifold. Not every smooth manifold has to be Cauchy complete. See Hopf-Rinow theorem.
I exist in reality and I'm smooth as fuck
>>16868307The pixels are 8-dimensional hyperspheres.
>>16868516>GRLiterally debunked by Bohr as it was published
>>16868346thumbs up for the honest signature, but did you want to say anything?
>>16868282Nobody knows. There appear to be fundamental limits of how rapidly certain things can move/change, but it is very uncertain the connection between those fundamental limits and the underlying framework of material reality. As an example, in truth, the question of whether anything can move faster than light/EMRF is somewhat of an unknowable when the "speed limit" of anything observable to us is functionally light. Does the world break down at these apparent quantum discontinuities, or do we simply enter into a region where our current tools for observe the world around them have become incoherent to the point of being unsuitable for accuracy?
>>16868282Define reality.
>>16868282At what scale? Big? Pretty smooth. Tiny? Actually more foamy and frothy.
Shit I really fucking hope so
>>16868282Smooth, the 4th dimension does that, everything above absolute zero is vibrating and the passage of time is smoothing those ocilations to a blurry mean of position, thermal expansion is a example of the smooth nature of practical matter
>>16868282It's course and rough and it gets everywhere
Smooth as your brain.
>>16868282Reality is what humanity defines it to be. If the observer effect holds true then that means that reality is subjective to the humanity. The only reason why there is a probability that light can be a particle or wave is because we impose the observation but using a third party like a sensor removes the ability to choose an outcome. Reality can be smooth if we want it to be if we find a way to control what quantum state a particle collapses into.
>>16870563>If the observer effect holds true then that means that reality is subjective to the humanity.Everyone get a load of this retard.
>>16870660I mind over matter you to have gender dysphoria
It depends on how far you zoom in
>>16870700Why would you want that you fucking pervert?
