If light is technically in all places at all times, would that not make visible light a reaction of the light that's already there? Is it an omnipresent part of the universe? Is lightspeed a myth if it's already everywhere?
>>16868727it's called electromagnetic field
>>16868741It's where the dark photons get sent to pick electrons.
>>16868741its called the aether libtard.
Redpill me on kinetic mixing.
>>16868741>>16868727WRONG. You idiots. It is dark heavy light. This is a scientific term chud.
Light is a manifold
>>16868727I think one day we will discover that aether actually exists and Einstein's formulas only worked by sheer coincidence.
>>16869176>it was just a pure coincidence goythank god for christ cucks
To understand light you need to understand the base building block of the universe that light is made from. So...we take a Pi quantity of magnetized, RGB base building block cubes at the bottom Planck level riding upon a square grid track lattice matrix. Then, to make either a string or a photon, we attach the magnetized RGB cubes in a straight line bar magnet configuration. The more train cars we attach onto our straight line photon chain, the more force it impacts with.Give it a push in the middle, instead of the engine or caboose, and you get a string vibrating instead of a photon moving in a straight line. Groups of the photons traveling magnetically interact with one another and form emergent larger structures much like sand on a plate with sound waves, creating the wave visualized in the double slit. So, everything in our universe is made from these base Planck layer RGB magnetized building blocks. Strangely enough the human eye can detect a single photon. The singularity at the start, and every black hole, are simply locations where no empty track hole locations exist, every location is filled up with broken down smallest level parts packed nut to butt, so no movement can occur, no observation, and thusly, no time.
>>16869222Thanks for responding seriously.
What’s the math?If photons are “chains of Planck RGB cubes,” what equations govern them, and how do you recover Maxwell’s equations / QED and E = h f?Lorentz invariance problem.A fixed square lattice at the Planck level usually implies a preferred rest frame. How does your model avoid breaking special relativity (or predict the size of the violation)?Double-slit doesn’t require photon–photon interaction.Interference shows up even when photons go through one at a time, so “groups of photons magnetically interacting” can’t be the main mechanism. What does your model predict in the single-photon limit?“More cars = more force” is ambiguous.Are you talking about higher energy, higher momentum, higher frequency, or higher intensity? Those aren’t the same thing.Black holes / “no time.”“No movement, no observation, thus no time” is not how GR formulates it. Time for an infalling observer behaves differently than for a distant observer; it’s not just “packed parts stop time.”
