[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (128 KB, 640x419)
128 KB
128 KB PNG
>The one-electron universe is the hypothesis that all electrons and positrons are actually manifestations of a single entity moving backwards and forwards in time. It was proposed by theoretical physicist John Wheeler in a telephone call to Richard Feynman in the spring of 1940. A similar "zigzag world line description of pair annihilation" was independently devised by E. C. G. Stueckelberg at the same time.
>Feynman was struck by Wheeler's insight that antiparticles could be represented by reversed world lines, and credits this to Wheeler, saying in his Nobel speech:
>I received a telephone call one day at the graduate college at Princeton from Professor Wheeler, in which he said, "Feynman, I know why all electrons have the same charge and the same mass" "Why?" "Because, they are all the same electron! (...) I did not take the idea that all the electrons were the same one from [Wheeler] as seriously as I took the observation that positrons could simply be represented as electrons going from the future to the past in a back section of their world lines. That, I stole!"[2]
>Feynman later proposed this interpretation of the positron as an electron moving backward in time in his 1949 paper "The Theory of Positrons".[3] Yoichiro Nambu later applied it to all production and annihilation of particle-antiparticle pairs, stating that "the eventual creation and annihilation of pairs that may occur now and then, is no creation nor annihilation, but only a change of directions of moving particles, from past to future, or from future to past."[4]
>>
File: kohler.png (139 KB, 1440x810)
139 KB
139 KB PNG
Unless there's experimental evidence I'm not interested.
>>
Physicists are retarded
>>
>>16869203
>every electron is the same if we ignore all of their differences
wow modern physics is just filled with philosophical gems
>>
>>16869203
I feel bad for actually reading all of that.
>>
>>16869203
Wheeler had a masterclass on trolling right there. The point was you can make any suitable story to fit together into some mathematical abstraction and it has nothing to do with what is actually going on.
Feynman being a chad just yoinked it from him and sent the meme into the stratosphere. It is almost exactly like schrodingers pussy.
>>
>>16869217
>Unless there's experimental evidence I'm not interested.
There is though? It's literally a model created to explain experimental evidence.

What you meant to bitch about was falsifiability.

Incidentally, it is falsifiable as explained since there's more electrons than positrons.
>>
File: fire.gif (1020 KB, 300x240)
1020 KB
1020 KB GIF
If electrons have no mountains, no distinguishable landmarks or features that differentiate one electron, from another, no difference in diameter, or indications of tilt, rotation, angle, then they are all indistinguishable from one another.
The quantity is greater than 1 as we know that Planck length and Planck time are the smallest units inside of our universe. To have a single electron transport from location to location would require a time slice quantity greater than the number of base building blocks (the quantity is Pi).
>>
>>16869322
Valid point.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.