Where do you find out about/follow cutting edge science?
>>16872843note that its aerodynamics is supported by the fact that his eyes and poop hole are at the same level
>>16872843>Where do you find out about/follow cutting edge science?https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en
>>16872863Doggo is in zen.You can see he is taking in spiritual energy into his 3rd eye then asstrally projecting out the back.
>>16872843this is now a mongolian dog wind tunneling forum
>>16873313Why it's tail isn't affected by the wind?
>>16873347its clearly beneath the directed jet but yes i too would love to see that tail lifted and flowing
no shit, through old top secret military projectsmost, if not all of the "new" technology that comes out today was already researched, documented, discovered and tested decades ago in some secretive military-funded lab
>>16873361Nope. Even the premise of stealth by reducing radar cross section using specially designed geometry was publicly published research before it was applied. Historically, most "secret" technology is only secret for a few years at most.
>>16873402What do you know about loosh farming? Is there a patent on it?
>>16873353>beneath the directed jetAero tube doesn't work like that, it has a laminar flow from top to bottom, highlighted with smoke at desired places.
>>16873361I think if I ask you to bring 5 examples, you'll fail. Some tech, like thinsulate did indeed come from NASA to regular market. Also some explosives. Maybe those stupid convertiplanes will do.But the shit with military is that they want robust and dumb solutions at big scale. And they are not limited in money. It's not always goes well with innovation. For example civic airplanes are much more fuel-efficient then military. FPV drones was initially developed for fun races (while military was making bullshit like Black Hornet). Commercial DJI Mavic is used for reconnaissance.
>>16873444this test was not subject to the usual test constraints.
