what's the best theory of your own that you've ever come up with? did it pan out?
>>16873253what a loon lmao
>>16873253I discovered that Pangea existed before I learned it in school. The shapes of Africa and South America just aren't coincidental
>>16873324he only put back physics for 100 years, not bad for a perverted scammer
my theory was that this board was all hack psued virgin incels. After years of testing and collating data it proved to be correct
>>16873340this guy is a sex-haver gigachad, he is better than all of us
>>16873253I do believe that the speed of light changes but nothing else does.
the big bang is inside whatever the event horizon of a white hole would be. Instead of all paths through time and space moving towards the singularity, all paths through time and space move away from it
>>16873253Law of explosion says a logical contradiction always leads to a deductive explosion.x=-x is the arithmetic description of a self-contradicting (ie self-negating) arithmetic logic element.Arithmetic axioms mandate the logical contradiction x=-x at x=0 because 0=-0 thus 0 can only be described as an oxymoronic valueless value.As a paradoxical consequence of 0=-0 as an origin number, completion of the arithmetic system necessitates leaps of the imagination that introduces complexity which infers x=-x for all x:x = x*1 = sqrt(x*x)*sqrt(1*1) = x*sqrt(-1*-1) = x*sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1) = x*i*i = x*i^2 = -x. Arithmetic is a numerical explosion of logic, all statements of truth made by arithmetic are trivial truths among infinite truths because its original number is a self negating logical contradiction that imbues self contradiction upon all values.The Standard Model of Physics is an emergent property of arithmetic by way of geometry, any models produced by physics, such as strings, rings, lies, groups, manifold, quantum foam or ultimately big bang, rely on arithmetic that is irrational at its core 0=-0 and not an accurate reflection of nature, by definition of logical contradiction and through the consequences described by the law of explosion.Total incoherence is at the most extreme poles where zero and infinity might as well be equivocated in their trivial projections.0 = 0 x 0 x ...infinity = infinity x infinity x ...Arithmetic/Physics is either illogical and irrational without making completely measurable predictions about nature or nature is illogical and irrational without being hindered by paradox or quantification predictions being infinitely trivial.This is why the best physics explanation is called a big bang, it is not a big natural bang, but a big numerical bang of arithmetic, geometric, physics, ..., inf, etc explosion based on a logical contradiction.
>>16873835Nah
>>16875314Fraid so
>>16873253I theorize that autistic isolated people get really hardcore into pornography because of an inherent biological drive to make them have numerous and repeated sexual encounters in order to expose them to more diverse and beneficial microbiota, because as is well documented, gut microbiota is the common denominator in autism.
>>16873253My theory is that soul is defined by the amount of interconnections between weights and the number of said weights themselves. In the brain those weights are neurons. I am currently working on a hardware that is supposed to mimic the structure and working principle of a brain. If theory is proven wrong, then it would mean that the soul is something only humans have and there might be some higher powers. If theory is proven right, we can create artificial souls and since the hardware limitation does not work on same principle as bilological one we will be able to create God in our lifetime.
>>16876773This is an interesting theory. It would be much more interesting if you provided what your definition of a soul is.
>>16873253I surpassed the speed of light by turning my head and the stars moved faster than light relative to my eyes lol.
pearls before swine
>>16876777777nicethe physics community hasn't had any new theories for years, they are scared to accept new ideas from people like pic related, so i would advise op to simply go on joe rogan and spread the word that way
I have a theory that most people who post here have never done academic research
>>16873835You are banging your head on the epistomontological dilemma that provides the real clue - everything is empty. Nagarjuna said it first.
>>16877150No, according to what has been presented, emptiness is paradoxical, so by your premise, everything is paradoxical and empty is just one such example of an infinite system generating paradox.
>>16873835my guy, your "x=-x for all x:x = x*1 = sqrt(x*x)*sqrt(1*1) = x*sqrt(-1*-1) = x*sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1) = x*i*i = x*i^2 = -x" is still wrong even in paraconsistent logic
P = NP implies N = 1.
Alpha + Alpha = 2 Alpha, Alpha + 2 Alpha = 3 Alpha, Alpha + 3 Alpha = 4 Alpha...* 1 3 7 . 0 3 5 9 9 9* 2 7 4 . 0 7 1 9 9 8* 4 1 1 . 1 0 7 9 9 7* 5 4 8 . 1 4 3 9 9 6* 6 8 5 . 1 7 9 9 9 5* 8 2 2 . 2 1 5 9 9 4* 9 5 9 . 2 5 1 9 9 31 0 9 6 . 2 8 7 9 9 21 2 3 3 . 3 2 3 9 9 11 3 7 0 . 3 5 9 9 9 *1 5 0 7 . 3 9 5 9 8 91 6 4 4 . 4 3 1 9 8 81 7 8 1 . 4 6 7 9 8 71 9 1 8 . 5 0 3 9 8 62 0 5 5 . 5 3 9 9 8 52 1 9 2 . 5 7 5 9 8 42 3 2 9 . 6 1 1 9 8 32 4 6 6 . 6 4 7 9 8 22 6 0 3 . 6 8 3 9 8 12 7 4 0 . 7 1 9 9 8 *
>>16873253i seem to have stumbled upon a general theory of emergence, that's kind of interesting. i try not to take it too seriously, just work on it as a hobby, but it is insanely compelling and has been one of those things that kind of writes itself
>>16873258you didnt have any evidence. so it was just a hypothesis.
I have a theory that our consciousness is constantly and always jumping through different timelines for any given conceivable action at any time, like a timeline where I punch my monitor for no reason after this post
>>16877733Which step is "wrong"?
>>16873253All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much, much thicker in the middle, and then thin again at the far end.
>>16876799Nothing you said is relevant to my post.
>>16873253if I pee right before I masturbate instead of right after the order of fluids being pushed through my urethra feels a lot less unpleasantdid it pan out: yes, still doing it this way
>>16877754maybe so, but it was a correct hypothesis
my theory is all 4chan users are highly retarded and intelligent. a term i refer to as retardigent.my proof: all the posts i've seen.
>>16873835>x=-x is the arithmetic description of a self-contradicting (ie self-negating) arithmetic logic element.This is your mistake.We have a universe where both X and ~X are True. Not one where x = -x.You have time to resubmit or withdrawal.
>>16876771autist hereyou are right but the second reason is also genghis khan idolizationautists dont wanna do family drama we just want to spread our obviously superior genes to save the planet
>>16873835Mmp solves this
>>16873253I was theorising the gravity's depth to the universe by the dispersal of heavier elements. After travelling far outside our current location into space, I could make out we are in a rotating black sphere to a central point of energy, interconnected to the body of a giant marine creature in a large amount of water. Then I leaned a story about a giant squid having the matter density to seal up to the hole to reality from the higher dimensional hole solvers.
>>16878339Once again demonstrating that autism is a form of extreme selfishness.
>>16873253After combusting a uranium mix some of the heaver elements like platinum, could create an energy chain feedback onto the platinum as the mass, creating an expansion of a whirling cloud in a higher dimension above it, (also affected by the moon's gravity) atomic energy circular waves spill out of like a giant spout far into the distance.
>>16878698no retard it's because the rest of you has an ego the size of the moon and whatever intelligent people say normies just shrug off and pretend to know better because being the big boy in the room is so so much more important than being right when you don't have anything actually useful to contribute to society but your large fucking mouth
>>16878115>We have a universe where both X and ~X are True. Not one where x = -x.Except I just showed how 0=-0 by definition and how you can equate x=-x for all x, so you have to mathematically prove that 0+0 != 0 and show what was wrong with the formula I provided where x = x*1 = sqrt(x*x)*sqrt(1*1) = x*sqrt(-1*-1) = x*sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1) = x*i*i = x*i^2 = -x to prove it wrong instead of just saying nu-uh.
>>16878663That image is already wrong because 0=0 and 1=1, 2=2, 3=3, etc, by law of identity, so that would mean you would have to equivocate 1 = [0 0], 2 = [0 0 0], 3 = [0 0 0 0] or 1 = [ [ ] 0], 2 = [ [ ] 0 0], 3 = [ [ ] 0 0 0], etc to keep the law of identity in tact, otherwise you are engaging in some kind of Terrology that doesn't respect the greater logic of math.
>>16880825you cant have infinitely many things or nothing things[math] 0 \circlearrowright \infty = \{\}[/math][math] 0 \circlearrowright \infty \circlearrowright \infty \circlearrowright 0 = \{\{\}\} = 1[/math]
>>16880973Too bad that reality is infinitely many things and despite that infinity I am currently holding nothing in my open hands.
>>16880821>you can equate x=-x for all x,This is your error.2 =/= -2.Pay me.
>>16873253The idea that 'evolution' cannot happen within the lifetime of a single individual is false.Through epigenetics, and cultivation of the microbiomes, evolution can occur in a single individual. I had this idea when I was studying physics back in college. I've seen only growing evidence and research pointing to this being correct.
>>16877791[math]\sqrt{-1}* \sqrt{-1} \neq \sqrt{-1 * -1}[/math]
>>16876794dalit this
>>16873835>x = x*1 = sqrt(x*x)*sqrt(1*1) = x*sqrt(-1*-1) = x*sqrt(-1)*sqrt(-1) = x*i*i = x*i^2 = -x. Most convoluted way i have ever seen to write sqrt(x^2)=|x| (with some formal mistakes)
>>16881150A population level phenomenon can't even be measured at the individual level. And the populations don't even exist because now it's hip to say species is arbitrary.
>>16881150but thats not evolution thats just normal biological processesjust trivializing evolution
>>16873253I have a theory that Evangelion is derived from the plot of Taxi Driver. Think about it, they're a perfect match. Iris is Rey, Betsy is Asuka, obviously Travis is Shinji, Wizard is Misato.Theropods aren't actually dinosaurs, but maniraptors are in actuality coelurosaurs. Theropods/birds are closely related to pterosaurs, and all of them are lizards not archosaurs.Creodonts are not part of crown mammalia.Most neanderthals and cro magnons were autistic.
>>16882940Your microbiome is a population.>>16883512evolution isn't a normal biological process?
>>16877754I don't have any evidence that you are a faggot, but it is true.
>>16881150that's not your theory thoughit's mine
>>16873253I don't think I've ever come up with a theory by myself that hadn't been theorized(sp?) previously by someone else, or that I hadn't found somewhere else and only realized after re-reading the source.I've also come up with "technical" stuff.. that other people had already thought decades ago.so I guess I'm not a special snowflake.>>16877754the OP asked for >theory of your own that you've ever come up withso that anon was correct, you retarded troll.>>16878110>my theory is all 4chan users are highly retarded and intelligent. a term i refer to as retardigent.kek
>>16881150evolution is the change in the average genetics of a population, that's something you can witness in less than a year.
>>16873253Everything moves at the speed of light at all times. What changes is which of the 4 dimensions you're moving through. If you're "motionless," you're moving through time at max velocity (c)
>>16877752elaborate
That Christ is King, though it's less of a theory and more indisputable fact.
>>16880983> I am currently holding nothing in my open hands.well, with this image related, if you printed it out you'd behold holding 1 thing
>>16873253>what's the best theory of your own that you've ever come up with? did it pan out?the stout copper pipes. not sure as i lack a suitable location to test it
>>16879113>hell yeah I want to have a bunch of neglected children around the worldkys
>>16883626evolution isn't biological, it's more mechanical
>>16873253I reformulate Grothendieck’s theory of motives as a categorical existence-and-obstruction problem, giving a concrete classification for genus-0 dessins and reducing the general motivic problem to the joint conservativity of realizations and the existence of a compatible motivic t-structure.
>>16884294tl;dr?
>>16884284its hard to do so without dropping formal defs because, as i've discovered, computer science is a circularly defined field but the qrd that captures it best (i guess) is that algorithms are scale invariant.
>>16884698A different way to go after the arhonov-bohm effect and maxwell-lodge effect . And a window into the structured water effect in microtubulesBasically copy thishttps://youtu.be/tlx7tDNXYR8And hollow out the bars with a pinhole .You get an osillation of really high magnetic vector potential to no vector potential down the length of the pin hole in a region of no magnetic fieldFill the pin hole with mercury and you got an easy way to measure the convective derivativeExtensions include thin films om the inside of the pipe and swapping out the pipe for a soleniod of quartz crystals (like microtubules)
>>16883626Can i get to the top of my dome with a micobiome?
>>16884700I sure hope you have already read and understood everything that Turing, Godel and Church wrote lol
>>16884711not everything, but the model is fun to work on and prove things with
>>16877754the party demanded you denied the evidence of your own eyes.
>>16884291nice
>>16884291But I didn't do that, so I am holding nothing because I can hold nothing, holding nothing is actually the first step to holding something else because if my hands were already holding things, I wouldn't be able to hold that thing, to do that, I would have to put the things I am holding down first, then I could pick up your thing and hold it.
>>16882921>sqrt(x*x)*sqrt(1*1) = x*sqrt(-1*-1)Not at all what happened since they clearly just assumed sqrt(x*x) = x at this step.
>>16885218>holding nothing is actually the first step to holding somethingAh the sin of the placeholder, those who inherited the mathematical fragments of atlantis, the sumerians, egyptians, didnt have a place holder- it wasnt until they collapsed several times did they lose sight of this distinction and began the this doublethink, this sin of the set theorist.No you cant hold nothing in the same fashion you cant contain an infinitely many thing. Mmp shows that one must balance the forces these forces.When you outstretch your hands, your regarding the infinite nothingness
>>16885292>No you cant hold nothingBut I am definitely holding nothing right now, I couldn't even type if I were holding something. If you couldn't hold nothing, you would have to be holding infinitely many things, the only thing that prevents one thing from being everything is the fact that 0 terminates it such that x=x+0 instead of x=x+x
>>16885292some may think this distinction irrelevant, but let me attest. man cannot separate his physics from his metaphysics, one may simply point to the proliferration of the $cientist in modern times. we've been conditioned to have attitudes and biases to say those who have 'empty' wallets, the poor.once you realize the infinite nothingness is yours by opening up your hands than you realize who have been filled with the infinite potential all along even when you have nothing
>>16885219The problem arises with how sqrt(1) is solved. The solution is 1 for the main branch, -1 for the other. If we use solutions from the other branch, sqrt(1)=-1. Nothing controversial here.
>>16885319I don't see a problem at all with the square root, except the fact that as you point out, it is not a function, but a relation on RxRxR
>>16873253>be me, circa 2008>watching my favorite niche hobbies get "popular">formulate the "dilution of competence" theory>premise is simple: the moment a barrier to entry is removed, the average iq of a community drops by 50 points>corporations see the numbers, panic, and pivot to cater to the mouth-breathers>complexity is stripped out>nuance is banned>everything becomes a safety-padded skinner box designed to milk engagement from people who can't read at a 5th grade level>friends called me a cynical elitist>said "let people enjoy things">fast forward to current year>gaming is just interactive movies with microtransactions>film is just cgi cape-shit for manchildren>the internet is a dead mall filled with bots and people arguing over headlines they didn't read>did it pan out?>look around you, newfag>gatekeeping wasn't toxicity>it was the immune system of culture>and now we're dying of aids
>>16885367Yeah theres no problem at all, i'm referring to the problem in the "proof" of x=-x.You can be on the main branch and say 1=sqrt(1)=1, you can be on the other branch and say -1=sqrt(1)=-1, but you cant switch branch at will to say 1=sqrt(1)=-1, like that anon said
>>16873253I met a guy who had theories.He went to school and studied all the old theories.When he left unsatisfied, he started pushing his own theories.His theories were adopted.Thats what you do if you want to be taken seriously.
By "theory" I assume you mean "hypothesis"When I was in 6th grade we had a very pretty spritely woman for a science teacher and she hammered into us, in no uncertain terms, that a hypothesis was NOT a guess. She repeated this lesson over and over: that one cannot simply make random guesses or speculation about any interesting factoid, and blithely call that a "hypothesis" or "theory". It must be based in observation with as much prior established fact as possible and present a falsifiable idea that can be tested and measured and reproduced to satisfy an ultimate conclusion. The addition of too many variables creates too much uncertainty that can disqualify many ideas from any sensible testing that can justify it being called a scientific hypothesis.tldr don't just guess random shit and call it a theory
>>16873253Everything is twinkies
>>16873253You could fall to the center of the earth by holding onto your body to the end of the energy period exchange with the Earth. It happened to me here after a great sadness; I sank into myself and got knocked off the spectrum. I was falling fast towards the core (hell), and I flexed back out to the other side of the world and had a connection with others.There are people and secondary outer bodies down there.
>>16873253I have theorized that men can only have 1 of these 3 things and live a normal life:>Psychedelics>Eastern Spirituality>A womanJohn lennon got greedy and took all 3 and them he got killed. Paul McCartney only chose 2 but he fucked John. Ringo starr chose 1 and he's alive and never did any weird shit.
