[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


So what did the science get wrong when the covid vaccine was initially released compared to what we know now? I heard a doctor say that the vaccine causes spike protein shedding but apparently there is no such evidence for this? But it does cause myocarditis which we were initially told that it doesn't cause. So who are we to believe and have there even been thorough studies to actually check to see if these statements are true?
>>
>>16874561
here's all you need to know:
anything that comes in a syringe is not needed
>>
>>16874697
Territorial hummingbird feathers typed this.
>>
File: r3erfvfe6c.png (272 KB, 500x500)
272 KB
272 KB PNG
>>16874561
>But it does cause myocarditis which we were initially told that it doesn't cause
IDK who said it doesn't cause myocarditis. What they said is that myocarditis is a risk, a VERY RARE risk in the vaccine like we are talking a 1 in 10,000 chance. Also weren't COVID Vaccines supposed to cause mass mortality or infertilities numbering in the billions? What happened to that anon?
>>
>>16874849
>IDK who said it doesn't cause myocarditis
Pfizer, Moderna and the CDC all did prior to the CDC's 'emergency meeting' in mid-2021 (that was delayed by brand new Juneteenth holiday) where they eventually agreed with the findings from an Israeli study in early 2021 that indicated 1/5000 young men developed myocarditis. 6 months after that study was published and millions had been injected they finally added myocarditis to the list of possible side effects, but still did not alter guidance for young men or anyone else.
>>
>>16874561
The vax (and covid in general) was not approached with a scientific perspective. Everybody knew exactly what kind of results they wanted and anything pointing in the wrong direction was disregarded
>>
1) Most deaths from Covid were from the elderly and obese demographics.
2) Most deaths from Covid have cormorbidities.
3) Autopsies are generally not performed on elderly and people who died with terminal conditions.

If autopsies aren't performed, how do you know the cause of death or what contributed to the cause of death beyond just guessing?

How do you know if vaccine had accelerated or even be be a direct cause of deaths or not if no investigation is done?
>>
>>16874908
Because a vaccine by definition is a substance used to keep you from getting sick and dying. It is literally impossible for it to be a "direct cause of deaths"
>>
File: 1744185866357.jpg (79 KB, 720x742)
79 KB
79 KB JPG
>>16874890
Science never stops never stopping. Always fresh. Always new. Science.
>>
>>16874910
Are you purposely being obtuse? Providing a definition for a substance doesn't mean the substance would behave only within the constraints of substance's definition.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.