https://quatism.com/lottery.htmAlso thishttps://qrng.anu.edu.au/random-permutations/set number of permutations to 1Set Number of objects in each permutation to 69screenshot first 5 numbers on top left that come right after :Those are your white ballsset number of permutations to 1Set Number of objects in each permutation to 26screenshot first number on top left that come right after :That is your red ballWhen you request a lottery number some bits are drawn from quantum divergences. Normally these bits might just aggregate out to nothing of consequence, but when amplified to a large-scale effect they will cause divergences of worldlines which would otherwise have just reconverged. More on this concept can be found in the Temporal Mechanics section of the Theory page of this site.What this means is that while a normal "random" lottery ticket like you might get from the store may be "random" - the RNGs used are not quantum mechanical in nature, meaning for every worldline you drew that ticket on you got the SAME ticket. If it wins this is great, but the chances are it won't win. When you use a quantum random number generator for ticket generation you get precisely 1 copy of EVERY combination of numbers
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1_ZsDBMPQMIBut instead of picking between two options you're picking between 300 million.
>>16876994assuming a 1:1 bit mapping, the algorithm here favors half of all possible combinations twice as much on average, but does include every possible combination with each generated ticket.)Does this mean you're likely to win? Following the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics it means a version of you will absolutely win, but your chances of being that version of you are equally slim as a normal random ticket. The existence of that version of you may hovever make it easier to make your consciousness to it via morphological travel as described in the Theory page of this site.As a word of caution: if you use this and get something crazy like 1,2,3,4,5+6 that is phenomenally unlikely, but you should still play the numbers for a proper mapping if you were planning to play the generated numbers beforehand because that is a combination guaranteed by the physics of the many worlds interpretation and each generated result must be played for this have complete coverage.
Bunny
only way to do anything like of prediction is to figure out which set of balls they are using and recording the way the balls start in the little spin thing, but by then it would already be too late
>>16876994>How to win the lottery with quantum physicsEasy, just use quantum immortality. Buy a lottery ticket and kill yourself if you don't win. Only the timeline where you won will remain.
>>16877162The whole thing behind the everett interpretation is that nothing ever collapses. The two parallel realities are the same overarching reality. How this relates to an emergent consciousness in that system is less easily defined.Personally, I wouldn't recommend leveraging quantum suicide to get what you want - theoretically it could work, but you'd be shrinking your soul in the process, and fucking up the lives of anyone who cares about you in a likely substantial number number of worldlines.Your soul is the sum of your many selves across the multiverse. It's where things like intuition come from: experiences and thoughts from your other selves who experiences some shit bleeding through to the selves which didn't in order to prevent them from fucking up and grow further than was achieved elsewhere.
>>16876994Not going to read your stupid post. If it worked, it would have been kept secret and used.
Just go to /biz/ and use the last two digits of every post in a thread that seems like a winner.
>>16878635No and here's why you're wrong >Reality isn't real and consciousness is all that exists.Physics/reality are an interface for consciousnesses to communicate with one another.You can see this testing conspiracy theory tech in private: it will work a bunch of the time, pretty much any time you believe it.If you get overly excited and show it to a physics PhD it will fall apart.If you show it non-physics-educated people, then stoner nerds, then nerds obsessed with physics but not formally educated, then those formally educated in physics but not working professionally in it, THEN a physics PhD, the effect will hold, but typically the physics PhD will obsess over it for a month or three then move on to something else because they never actually had a mind for physics to begin with (that's more or less what academia selects for these days.)Controlling reality in private is easy, pushing those effects to a wider audience is harder because reality is an interface to communicate, not a real thing. All parties involved need to be able to not necessarily make sense of or comprehend it, but for it to mesh with their own worldview/reality.A good example is relativity vs quantum mechanics - both are "real," both work, both have predictive capacity, and both are completely irreconcilable with one another - essentially two distinct rulesets for reality which were widely held by everyone who cared to look and accepted as truth by everyone else until they became real.Electrodynamics and aether theory imo pose the greatest potential currently to merge+expand on "physics," just keep in mind it's all a bunch of bs and try not to paint yourself (and everyone else) into a corner like they did with QM and GR by failing to understand that
>>16877001So the only way this works is if all my MWI twins also play their numbers, even in the universes where they don't.I think I see your error.Otherwise, nice try. Will read next thread.
>>16880072But you can generate and play more then one ticket at once. What if you generate 4 quantum powerball tickets and play all 4? That guarantees coverage. You can also just generate and play 1 quantum powerball ticket and then generate and play 4 psuedo random tickets right after based on something like a clock that goes down to the microsecond or something. In each of or most of the different universes and you'll get different pseudo random numbers
>>16880076My twin who said no, said "no".Everything collapsed.You owe me a new qubit.
>>16876994 I like the wackiness of this.
>>16880418Thank you
>>16879050sounds good
>>16880039The essence of communication was through a wave function technique, so the soul can be it all at once. Can't do that well with machines attached.
>>16878635This
>>16876994Unironically, that looks like an absolutely valid QM experiment in todays Copenhagean paradigm.No physics, no formulas, just pure Niels-Bohresque abracadabra.
>>16880418me too
