>>16879985why wouldn’t it be chud?
>>16879985I already paid your mom for the abortion. Not my fault she kept you.
>>16879985Yes, consciousness makes it real
>>16879985yeah bro how else would the time traveling reptilian overlords keep us in the dark about their illegal rectal probing ploy
>>16880019how?
>>16879985If it is, it creates a cannon event in a third dimension. Thus, for there to be any form of retro-causality there would have to be a higher dimension, with greater complexity. The fourth dimension does not work to complete this explanation because of Dimensional Geometry of Non-Compatible Vectors in 3D Space. Thus, for this to work mathematically, there has to be a 5th dimensional space with more complexity involving (infinity^2)0 - Origin and End Void 1 - Perspective Point 2 - Vector Plane 3 - Universe 4 - Paradoxical Boundary Infinite requirements 5 - Post Infinity and everything beyond, including infante more origin Voids. Infinity squared is NOT the same as infinity. The fractal goes on forever, until it loops in on itself. I have invisible math to prove this, but I just need some time to explain it. I also would prefer that this doesn't get stollen, but I would voluntarily donate it if that is the only way to get it applied. Humanity does not have much time before the parasitic Homo Corpus sub species finished their genocide.
>>16880044So like the Block Universe?
https://pastebin.com/TQtU8h05These don't necessarily have to be Transcended From, in terms of bias buybacks I wonder of the -, and how Absence of the -, will Create +https://pastebin.com/CwD1CBSJhttps://pastebin.com/HMDGibmBhttps://pastebin.com/bfHzzN1Qhttps://pastebin.com/HNm40fSvhttps://pastebin.com/i3TYAyyyhttps://pastebin.com/D3yaqvZG (this one is hypothetical ?)https://pastebin.com/quQxxc8uhttps://pastebin.com/a6HypRqYhttps://pastebin.com/qFdtjMBG
>>16880022 Why is pewdiepie in the upper right?
>>16879985some link to what the fuck retrocasuality is would help
>>16879985yeah bro quantum mechanics disproves common sense and Christian morality bro Professor Finkelberg's experiments prove it
>>16880426Why wouldn't he be?
made up science bitch psychosis slop isn't realscience is a fake authority
>>16879985It used to be.
>>16879985yes.
>>16880634later events causing earlier events
>>16879985(1/2)Suppose you're reading a story. In the beginning, the author drops some details, some clues that you file under "world-building" but consider otherwise insignificant. Only as you're nearing the end do you realize the importance of those details, how they tie the entire plot together and lead into a satisfying finale. Having read the whole thing, you get a sense the author couldn't have written the first half of the story without a decent idea of how the second half goes. You're also sure he couldn't have written the clever setup at the very beginning without already knowing the very end.If you experienced the plot from inside the story's fictional universe, it would maybe seem like retrocausality to you: as if the future had planted its own seeds in the past, intent on leading towards one specific, meaningful outcome. But looking at it from outside, as a savvy reader, or especially a savvy writer, you know there's a literary superstructure guiding how events unfold on a higher level than cause and effect. The author employs his symmetries and contrasts and ironies, a fractal of recurring patterns and motifs, to end up with a story logic where not only does the beginning imply the end, but also vice versa. The two are a perfect matched that transcends time, both inside and outside the story's universe. You can almost see this structure resting in some corner of Plato's Realm of Perfect Forms. Then the author just needs to figure out a string of minor events that could mediate his plot points in real life. So he ends up with a coherent, if unlikely on the whole, causal chain. And still its implicit logic seems to flow from the future into the past at times, depending on how you look at it.
>>16881658(2/2)I guess this sounds like an allegory for God's Plan or something, but I have in mind something more literal and mundane: you know how people with zero writing talent use chatbots to write entire books now? If you have a bit of tech knowledge, you know the architecture behind such chatbots is called a Transformer. If you have a bit more tech knowledge, you also know they fall in the category of Causal Transformers, because they only generate one token at a time, with no real planning or foresight. The next token depends solely on the previous ones. Intuitively, they shouldn't be able to generate anything with a non-causal overarching structure on top of the locally causal transitions from one token to the next, but they can and they do. People call this sort of thing an "emergent property" but no one ever stops to consider emergence can be TEMPORAL, let alone that they've been playing around with a nontrivial example of exactly that. So who's to say the rules behind reality's seemingly causal unfolding can't do as much and more?
>>16881658That's right, it's me, I'm the main character.
>>16879985it will be
>>16879985There are some non-traditional theories of quantum mechanics that allow for it at very high energy scales, while still retaining causality at a macroscopic scale.
>>16880634https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiynF8NQzgo
