The axiom of choice is complete bullshit. You can't just make a set out of whatever you want
Who gonna stop me, nigga?
Let S be the set of all things I feel like including in S at this moment.
>>16882253yo' momma so fat even if S existed, she would not be able to fit within the set, thus contradicting the existence of such a set.
>>16882244cool it with the anti semitism
>>16882244So much goong on in that post that you just didn't know.Didn't you?
>axiom>you can'tok retard
>>16882244You've misunderstood. The idea is that you can make whatever you want out of a set.
>>16883940axiom: you're a faggot who will suck my cock
> The axiom of choice is complete bullshit.Sure, just as the principle of excluded middle.See https://prl.khoury.northeastern.edu/img/sicm.pdf
>>16882244What's a set?
>>16884215Is [math] \neg (\neg P) \equiv P [/math]? If this is always the case then [math] \neg (\neg P \land P) \equiv P \lor \neg P [/math]or that the law of the excluded middle is just the negation of the law of non-contradiction.
