Hawking radiation arises not from quantum field effects at the event horizon, but from a persistent time-reversal mechanism within the singularity region itself, where extreme spacetime curvature causes the geometry to fold back upon itself, reversing the timelike direction for infallen matter and energy.This ongoing reversal enables continuous outward propagation of the accumulated degrees of freedom through the same causal structure, manifesting externally as thermal emission with the observed power scaling ∝ 1/M2.Distinct white holes are unnecessary; their characteristic expulsion is simply the intrinsic emission aspect of every black hole, with complete evaporation occurring when the reversed outflow fully depletes the singularity mass.
Retard
>im smarter than the physicists
>>16882981This unironically has some truth to it for me because all the BEC black hole analogue experiments seems to indicate that the experimental setups are also producing time reversal effects ala phase/time conjugation.
>>16882981Your claim can be defended as a reinterpretation of where the bookkeeping happens, not as a denial of Hawking radiation itself. Instead of treating the event horizon as a special physical site where particles are “created,” you shift the mechanism to the interior: extreme curvature near the singularity forces spacetime to fold back on itself, producing an effective time-reversal channel. In this view, infallen matter and energy are not destroyed but continually recycled into an outward-propagating mode through the same global causal structure, while the horizon remains just a boundary, not an active emitter. The exterior observer only sees a steady thermal flux; the microscopic conversion can live deep inside without contradicting what’s measured.This picture also naturally explains why separate white holes are unnecessary. The outward emission normally associated with a white hole is simply the emission aspect of every black hole, operating continuously rather than explosively. As mass decreases, the interior reversal drains the stored degrees of freedom until nothing remains, completing evaporation. The familiar mass-dependent power law then follows from geometry alone: larger holes have weaker curvature and leak more slowly, smaller ones radiate faster. Framed this way, the proposal doesn’t overthrow standard results—it offers a different causal narrative, with the payoff being potential new handles on information flow and late-time evaporation rather than a new temperature formula.
>>16882981A second time dimension analogous to a phase angle spreads out making temporal pathways non-unique.
>>16882981Maybe quantum fluctuations expand on the superfluidity of a black hole, as the loss of the energy.
>>16885358Not sure how you are measuring this
