There was life on Mars, and there may still be life especially under the surface. This is a fact and stop pretending it's a question that's up in the air that could. And no, it's not just these fossils. There's multitude of evidence that all converge on the same answer that there was life on the surface of Mars.
>>16884544that's why musk is sending 20 million people to Mars by 2028
Bennu (101955) has the pre-life biological building blocks, not mars, if you want to find non-earth life it's in the historical solar system, not on mars
Isn't one of Mars moon in a decaying orbit in a million years anyway. We should be talking in 100's of millions years if we make a move for anything.
>>16884571there can be more than one. what is life highlander?
>>16884581There can be only one
>>16884544provide proofs.
>>16884544>not just these fossils.You have not shown that.>There's multitude of evidenceTragically, you have shown none.>that all converge on the same answer that there was life on the surface of Mars.Still wrong.
>>16884558>that's why musk is sending 20 thousand people to Mars by 2050ftfy
>>16884544ok i chuckled
>>16884571So a parent body formed that shit and delivered it to Earth. But why is the parent body even needed if Earth can just produce it itself like the parent body?
>>16885213it's possible it is a part of a larger planet that both was part of, it's unlikely to be a seeder
>>16884544troll posting Exhibit A.
>>16884544All based on assumptions and sloppy "data." The whole "life on Mars" stuff is a big tax money grift.
