Is science a human right? Is this ethical?
science is for everybody, peer reviewer is academia, you have to earn it
>>16885392>science is for everybodywhy?
>>16885394science is just a process, a way of thinking, production unrelated
>>16885395Should everyone have it?
Scientific method should be used on everyday basis in any field.Science is a right AND obligation (in my ideal world)
Use the detective method at first to compile a list of suspects. Then exclude them one-by-one using the scientific method.
>>16885392what happens if i have a phd and i peer review people's stuff outside of acadaemia?
>>16885442I see a suspicious episode of self-harm in your future.
>>16885397Should everyone have the ability to hear?
>>16885394because science is not a physical thing or a specific school, it is a methodology that it is not possible or practical to restrict humans at any level of the hierarchy from performingyou do "science" whenever you observe a phenomenon and attempt to replicate a predicted result by repeating or altering the action that instigated it. non-rigorous and imprecise science to be sure, but that is, at its most basic, all science is.the concepts of "the institution of science" or "the scientific consensus" or academia are separate matters but those are not " science " as an basic raw concept
>>16885442Then you are either ignored or someone publishes you, though the latter is unlikely without certain requisite social skills and basic knowledge and training in the generally accepted channels by which these things are typically done.There is a website called Substack that is very popular among scientists and doctors to speak their mind and present ideas or review other peoples' ideas without direct limit or control by scientific governing bodies.
>>16885881>an (...) conceptHoly halfwit
