>Why isn't there an official explanation for the HUGE rise in fetal deaths starting in Q2 2021? There was not a change in reporting rules and there was no public campaign telling doctors or people to report FETAL DEATHS.https://x.com/stkirsch/status/2008267839938215958Very interesting but not really surprising for me xDThats barely beginning, by the way. Would be worse and worse year after year. Thats how poisoning with a gene therapy works.A 2023 retrospective cohort study using VAERS data from 1998-2022 found significantly elevated proportional reporting ratios for miscarriage, fetal death/stillbirth, and other pregnancy-related adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination compared to influenza vaccines. The relative risk for miscarriage was 177 (95% CI: 114.4-283.5). The authors called for a moratorium on vaccinating pregnant womenhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10694405/A 2025 medRxiv preprint analyzing 226,395 singleton pregnancies in Israel (2016-2022) reported higher-than-expected fetal losses after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in gestational weeks 8-13. For dose 1, there were approximately 3.9 additional losses per 100 pregnancies (95% CI: 2.55-5.14), with most occurring after week 20.https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.06.18.25329352v1.full.pdf
>>16885900vax or new covid variant. call it
>>16885900Not my problem. I have no interest in having children. And I couldn't care less if humanity went extinct.You should be more worried real threats. How about microplastics and PFAS, both of which are inside literally everyone and everything? Also there's all those heavy metals in the air and water, from burning fossil fuels and mining. And don't forget about God-knows-what pesticides and herbicides make their way into your food and water too!
>>16886317why do you care?
>>16886318Because this thread is like seeing someone scream about a stubbed toe, while they're completely ignoring the fact they are standing in a building that's on fire and about to collapse.It's some goofy ass shit that's laughable and sad.
>>16886323But why care about the building that's on fire at all? Like you said, who cares if humanity goes extinct?
>>16885900IDK OP how does that year compare to all previous years for the last 70 years?get back to me when you have those numbers m-kay.
>>16886326Because there's more on Earth than just humans? Do you think humanity lives in a vacuum? Do you worship humanity?
>>16886333Oh nooo think of the ants
>>16886333>That heat graph is completely misunderstood. We don't love space rock more than our families. It was inclusive. It was inclusive!Don't take much to scratch through the facade.
>>16886341>>16886346>posting this unironicallyGee I wonder why someone would ever choose not to care about you.
>>16886355ok really though why would you care if all life on earth vanished?
>obviously aligned with presidential periodsShouldn't it be obvious? either they're including official abortions or women are aborting more without specifying the death cause and or it's more reported.
>>16886341>silly human here thinking he is superior to the antsyou lack critical information