>>16885978
>https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.05027
>particles traveling through electromagnetic fields
Its called acceleration

>>16886042
Cerenkov =/= Larmor, physlet

So i lowkey need to use this thread to vent about Ken the retard for a second here

He rails against muh ebul AI endlessly but then posts shit like this on his substack;

>kenwheeler.substack.com/p/fact-based-ai-destroys-so-called

... Guy has a huge ego issue with being proven wrong on anything or being intellectually held accountable for what he says by anything but a passive admiring audience, huge huge hypocrite. In one vlog the other day he went off like "Don't ever trust AI, it's evil!"

He's pretty brilliant but also a huge hypocrite and generally an asshole on a personal level, don't ask how i know lol

... Same for the forced and constant blathering about "academicians" in general. Like my guy, just outright say you can't stand open criticism by a peer in a non-curated debate and won't ever cross that evaluation treshhold due to your identity having become utterly intertwined with your own iterative/non-expansive framework. I hate when otherwise bright people screw themselves over like this out of a misplaced sense of 'pride'

>>16886376
>pretty brilliant
>ken wheeler
Pick one

>>16886376
>>16886378
I don't know Ken Wheeler, but he sounds like Ethical Skeptic. Problem is it's so easy to exploit normcattle that don't understand STEM. Just throw some fancy words at em with some confidence. You don't even need equations, but the second you include them the normcattle brain thinks you're Christopher Columbus creating a lunar eclipse.