Philosophically, existentially, and ontologically, what would the opposite of Earth be like?Our lifeforms are mostly flesh and blood.Our weather is cyclical.Our environment constantly decay and renew itself.Our materials are made of tangible matter.So would an anti-Earth be a world where lifeforms are not organic, don't experience aging, weather is still, the environment never decays, and "matter" is something ectoplasmic or fluid?
>>16886125Heaven or Hell.Unaging, unimaginative, unresponsive, unexpressive, unchanging, etc. On earth, everything is constantly changing, everything from people, things, universe, concepts, are all changing. Change is our existence. And suffering as a result of such. Which drives our responses to escape it, for a better tomorrow. The anti-earth would be a stagnant luster of immortality where there's ever eternal decadent.
