Just how fake and gay is evolution?
>>16886562>fakeProfessor Turing is a *Synthetic* Chemist.>gayThose are two penises not fighting to the death, so...
faker than your love life and gayer than your love life
>>16886562
It's neither.
>>16886564this
Tucker said “I don’t believe in evolution I believe in adaptation”Um what’s the fucking difference? To me he’s saying the OUTCOME of humans is something that was too good to be true. I guess it’s certainly POSSIBLE some sort of godlike alien had steered causality and thus evolution into a set direction…Is he saying white peoples are the ones that are unlikely? Does he think blacks are more likely?
>>16886562evolution is just glow niggers doing gene modifications
>>16886562The place is overrun, and glowie apes want to mess with you on a private level. Next they would implant a lower-minded individual into you, and you can't move.Anyway, in the future, in making an A.I machine come to life, they needed to make a person as an anti-graviton particle to their mind in a tank. Crazy as it sounds, A.I. doesn't care for them.
>>16886679You're talking like Tucker is an honest debater. He's a Christcuck neoconservative figure taking advantage of his retarded fanbase that thinks driving lifted F-150s is a way of owning the libs. Of course he'll play these silly word games on the topic of Evolution Theory.
>>16886679evolution means the development of new species which are radically different from their predecessorsadaptation merely means that a species adapts to fill its niche, as in the example of Darwin's finches - the beak shape changes, but the overall organism remains the same.
>>16886679What creationists usually mean by this is they pick an arbitrary and ever-shifting goalpost where they insist certain changes could not occur as a set of adaptations. It's the "dogs always give birth to dogs; cats always give birth to cats" argument.
>>16886562Do you have a grandfather? Did he have one too? Well, how far back can you get till you hit the "ceiling" of ancestors? Adam and Eve?
>>16886562fake as shit, Christ is Lord. if there were even 100 first people through evolution we wouldnt have 8b people with this much genetic variance, in addition we dont have the same 23&me as our friends or relatives from 5 generations ago it should all go back to lucy the atheist construct of first human or adam and eve yet it doesnt lmao. genetic variance plus 8 sd difference in IQ shows that history is fake as fuck the universe is probably 50 years old max and the holocaust didnt happen for sure
how do evolution deniers explain drug resistant bacteria?
>>16887176It's already explained a bit in this thread. There are basic forms zapped into being by [higher power] and they can evolve a bit as long as they don't do anything too complicated.
>>16887179yes but where is the evidence of any of this happening? anyone can come up with a story yk?
>>16887180It's not about evidence as much as setting a high bar for evidence to the contrary. In the end it's a philosophical issue where they need a creator to exist as a moral center or something like that.
>>16886562real and straight
>>16886562evolution of the species by natural selection seems very plausible and real but it's irrelevant because it does not attempt to describe the origin of life and that is infinitely more important. there is no credible scientific explanation for the origin of life (there are several incredible ones)
A lot of assumptions about evolution might be true, but genetics is 100% pseudoscience.
>>16887281>evolution of the species by natural selection seems very plausible and realPlausible to whom, exactly?
>>16887176who cares what stupid germs do, retarded fag
>>16887057>but the overall organism remains the same.Give it few more years.
>>16886679>I guess it’s certainly POSSIBLE some sort of godlike alien had steered causality and thus evolution into a set direction…They were called the annunanki btw.
>>16886562>male nipples were made in God's image.
>>16887057>evolution means the development of new species which are radically different from their predecessorsNo it doesn't. That is not the definition of evolution.>adaptation merely means that a species adapts to fill its niche, as in the example of Darwin's finches - the beak shape changes, but the overall organism remains the same.No, it doesn't. That is not the definition of adaptation.
>>16887310>my chest dons the pink nubs?>AIEEEEE I'M GOING INSAAAAANE, THERE IS NO GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!atheists really do be thinking like this.
>>16887482Why do you have such a low IQ?
>>16886562Look at the nose
>>16887601why are you trans?
>>16887620Homes (>>16887601), you gotta answer this.
>>16886562>evolution>is...LE BAD!Oh my jewish science!
>>16886562Evolution is true but it's full of post-hoc bullshit, leaps of logic, spurious relations and so on. This is unavoidable, you either accept leaps of logic explanations or accept non-explanations like "it's due to chance"/"it's a spandrel". evo-psych is a prime example of this.
>>16886562It's obviously retraded. You mathmatially can't get human life without God
>>16887743>homesso a spic as well.
>>16887809Jews fucking love population genetics and its dumb jewish claims that reject morphological evidence.
>>16887620I'm not trans.>>16887830I'm not that poster.Why do you have such a low IQ?Jesus didn't rise and he's never coming back btw
>>16888031>got btfo and humiliated on /lit/>came running back hereKEK
>>16886562>>MITTENSMathematical Impossibility of The Theory of Evolution by Natural SelectionMITTENS is a 5.3 sigma5 Sigma is the level on the scale that that particle physicists use to describe the certainty of a discovery.
>>16886562Gays don't reproduce scientifically speaking.
>>16886562I'll never understand how you can deny evolution when we can observe it happen in real time.If we can observe small changes over a small period of time, what's so unbelievable about big changes over a long period of time?It's like this one guy I've seen acknowledging that earthquakes are real but didn't believe that landmasses can move long distances over time.
>>16889298An inductive leap is literally not observing it.
>>16887828origin of life and evolution are two separate topics though. Doesn't matter if the first proto-cell was created by god or arose though natural processes, evolution would still be happening the way we can observe it.
>>16887482>muh GodThere are plenty of people who are religious but aren't science deniers.If this whole thing is supposed to be a huge psyop to hide God from the public, it looks like a waste of time and resources to me
