ITT we decide if we are destroying our brain cells by scrolling an iphone held about 8-10 inches from the face for any extended period of time.>picks up the iphone 16 pro max > opens an app>boobs>scrolls for 30 minutes>gets dementia many such cases or all just fearmongering?In this image we see Dr Jack Kruse reference a study done on small rodents showing brain cell destruction after mobile device exposureThe idea is the EMF from the cell tower/phone wireless signal alters Calcium voltage potential so when toxin signal the endothelium receptors of their presence the BBB can not effectively constrict to prevent them entering the brain and there they damage cells by oxidation leading to their death. Is the human anatomy functionally more resistant to this EMF so such exposures which typically occur daily will not suffer from this Ca voltage interference or not?
>>16886568Personally I am not even sure EMFs can alter the deltaV across a membrane. That delta V is due to the flow of ions across the membrane due to different concentration at the two sides. I can see a electric field moving the ions, but the cell would try to maintain equilibrium... if a phone EMF is strong enough to alter the cell deltaV then very likely the cell would die of osmosis imbalance way before your BBB starts leaking.
Dementia statistics that would at least correlate?
>>16886585>phone EMF is strong enough to alter the cell deltaVhttps://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-e&q=EMFs+can+alter+the+deltaV+across+a+membrane.in normal healthy adults symptoms of this type of brain tissue loss would take years to reach a point where cognitive impairment became evident. Simply look around ad ask yourself if you consider the general population appear to be acting with even normal intelligence these days.. if you say yes you may be a mobile tech shill.
I am suffering from EMF sensitivity and feel destroyed because I cant find anyone who can explain to me why my body reacts very intensily to these wireless and wired emf fields. I have so many symptoms from muscle cramps to pain to intense itching.
>>16887026get earthed/grounded as frequently as possible and try to locate yourself as far away from sources of EMF's as you can manage.
Someone look at cataract rates
>>16886568>Drip-feeds himself easy dopamine (pornography and scrolling)>Gets addicted to short-term gratification>Surprised when brain reacts to this influx of constant dopamine the same way it reacts to every influx of constant dopamine ever>Puts on tin-foil hat and blames non-ionizing radiation You're not getting microwaved you're just an addict like the rest of us desu
>>16886568I mean, a lot of this is somewhat plausible, but still mostly speculation, unfortunately fuelled by schizo shit. It would take so long to gather data on this, that by the time we might say something meaningful, the consequences will already have taken a toll on our species. If it's a nothingburger, then it doesn't matter anyway.A very large component of things like this, is that the human body's own self-regulatory mechanisms are extremely unappreciated in two ways. One is that it's far more potent than most people believe, in virtually every domain (insulin sensitivity/glucose metabolism, dopamine signalling, testosterone signalling and production, acetylcholine signalling, autophagy, calcium metabolism and exchange between blood/bones/teeth, etc.). Understanding homeostatic mechanisms and self-regulatory cycles, and how to make them function as intended through lifestyle choices, will most likely help most individuals to prevent long-term effects from these technologies from ever harming them. On the other hand, our way of life in most of the world as well as all these types of technologies (and especially micoplastics) completely disrupt these self-regulatory cycles, and very few people understand just how incredibly harmful that is.
