Oppenheimer's IQ was only 135 lmao a literal brainlet
I humbly request Germany put their pet gimp on a leash again, it is acting up and causing much annoyance.>Payment never
>>16887700I mean how stupid do you have to be to create a doomsday bomb, for basically free, and then hand it over to some basically random assholes who work for the government. I mean any person who's read a history book knows all government is corrupt and evil and seeks only power and only via violence. I mean what did he honestly think was going to happen? This retard built TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF BOMBS EVEN! WHY?! Like what the fuck was his problem with humanity?135 IQ? More like 70! This retard got played like a rube at the county fair. He's a literal monster and the world would be a much better place had his mother aborted him in the womb. With out exaggeration he's one of the worst human beings to ever live. Unironically he's killed more people than all historic serial killers combined, and for what? He turned the world into a suicide cult that is likely to end the entire human race. 135 IQ? This fucktard is so stupid I'm shocked he could wipe his own ass and tie his own shoes.
>>16887700But in the movie he was shagging a woman in front of another girl. The bar is high to be Oppenheimer.
>>16887771The case against him can be framed through these key points:1. Creation of an Existential ThreatOppenheimer is criticized for using his immense intellect to bridge the gap between theoretical physics and the practical mass slaughter of civilians. Critics argue that by successfully leading the Manhattan Project, he provided humanity with the means to destroy itself, a legacy that continues to loom over global security in 2026.2. Complicity in Mass Civilian CasualtiesWhile many scientists hesitated as the project neared completion, Oppenheimer served on the scientific committee that recommended the bomb be used against Japan as soon as possible. Targeting: He did not significantly challenge the decision to drop the bombs on densely populated civilian centers like Hiroshima and Nagasaki rather than military-only targets. Unapologetic Stance: He never issued a formal apology for the bombings. Even after the war, he stated his only regret was that the bomb was not finished in time to be used against Nazi Germany.3. Ceding Ultimate Power to the StateOppenheimer is accused of "casually" surrendering this unprecedented weapon to the U.S. government without securing meaningful safeguards or international controls beforehand. Bureaucratic Subservience: By positioning himself as a loyal advisor to the state, he legitimized the government's total control over nuclear technology. Belated Activism: Critics argue his post-war advocacy for arms control was "too little, too late"—a "crybaby" attempt (as President Truman called it) to absolve his conscience only after the damage was irreversible.4. Moral Value JudgmentOpponents of his legacy suggest he made a catastrophic value judgment: that the advancement of science and immediate military goals outweighed the long-term survival of human civilization. In this view, he was not a "tragic hero" but a willing architect of a new, permanent state of terror.
>>16887771They would've made them anyway until some scientists gave up.
>>16887774It's sad that cuckqueans aren't a real thing. Science needs to get around to inventing that.
