Is there literally any experimental data to back this up?
>>16893736*Are there
>>16893737Go back to the humanities thread
>>16893736I dunno. Is there a link to an article or something we can read to find out?
>>16893736What's @forallcurious's H index?
Gwaihir predicted this over 5 years ago
>>16893736at the quantum level, sure. a lot of stuff you want to calculate ends up being the integral over possibilities, which gives room for batshit crazy theoriesbut all that cancels out at the macroscopic level so that time is uniform and continuous.
>>16893736can't tell just from a pop-sci twitter post but I guarantee you the answer is no and it's some theoretical metaphysical gobbledygook
The science has changed chud