if a naked singularity can actually exist irl, what would it look like?
>singularity does not exist, even in normal black holes. see string theory for what actually happens.
>>16894065idk, but it would be extremely painful
it doesn't look
>>16894065It would curve space so much that it would look extremely distorted, indistinguishable from random noise
singularities don't exist, they're mathematical expressions of some limit. are you really this stupid? did you even look up anything before posting? no of course not
>>16894526>midwit mathtard detectedno one cares about your gay pedantic bullshit. people use singularity when referring to black holes. its extremely close to being one. same with the pre-BB universe. kill yourself
>>16895287does the tan function exist physically, can you even imagine its asymptotes? these are conceptual structures, not some region or event in spacetime
Black holes do not exist. Schwarzschild metric is just a mathematical solution with an artifact in the center, exactly like Newtonian gravity and EM have 1/r when r->0 - this is "singularity".There still is no experimental evidence for black holes, it is all either neutron stars or other supermassive objects.>But muh event horizon telescope M87 photos!1!!First, these are photos of accretion. The matter can fall on any supermassive object and emit light.Second, these photos are cherry-picking and heavy post-processing to produce an Interstellar-like picture so that basedjaks and sponsors could be happy.
>>16895344
>>16894065Event horizon is complete a nonsense. And, subsequently, singularity is too. Clearly tis just a mathematical limit of the applicability of the GR.Though there may be an apparent horizon, which is present even in Newtonian mechanics btw as a solution for escape-velocity being c.
>>16895374thanks for giving me an actual answer, even if this isnt close to reality its a cool visualization
>>16895448It's a raytrace from wikipedia.I think it would mostly depend on the kind of black hole. If it's a naked singularity because of rotation, the frame dragging effect would be very visible, with one side glowing brightly while the other would be dim black.
>>16895449>How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?>Well, depends on a kind of pin. If they are naked and a pin is rotating, then...Yeah, sounds like absolutely valid and verified physical phenomenon, totally not a made-up bullshit to write and sell popular science books will cool pictures
>>16895511>write and sell popular science books*moviesPeople working on Interstellar published a paper on rendering realistic black holes.https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/32/6/065001
>>16895517>>16895511why do dropout schizophrenics come on this board? go back to /x/ and /pol/ where you belong
>>16895528Do you have any actual arguments that support the existence of a singularity anywhere but on paper?Like really, I am not trolling.
>>16895533there are mountains of astronomical observations that confirm black holes are real that you will disregard immediately because it doesnt fit your schizophrenic delusions, whats the point? your entire "argument":>science is fake and gay, and all the evidence that proves me wrong is a lie, because I said so and I dont like itplease unironically kill yourself
>>16895537>there are mountains of astronomical observations Those aren't mountains, they're are waves!
>>16895546
>>16895537I promise, I won't disregard them.Give me at least one example of an object 100% classified as a Schwarzschildean black hole (with a singularity in the centre).Not just some supermassive attractor with a bunch of stars orbiting it, not some vague accretion, not a relativistic jet, but a valid black hole.I am also addressing everyone reading this, not just you.
>>16895560>what is 2+2? ...and dont say four!!
an object with uncountably infinite folds and undulating contours that would break your mind the moment you look at it
>>16895649By your logic, proof that it's four and only four and nothing else can be four.
>>16894068>>16894526>>16895310>>16895344>>16895436lol
>>16894526>>16895675singularities don't exist, they're mathematical expressions of some limit. singularities are just infinities that mean "wrong answer". are you really this stupid? did you even look up anything before posting? no of course not
>>16895684bot post
>>16895688singularities don't exist, they're mathematical expressions of some limit. singularities are just infinities that mean "wrong answer". are you really this stupid? did you even look up anything before posting? no of course not.
>>16894065It wouldn't look like anything. It would be too small to measure even.The reason things have a "look" when you look at them is because they reflect or emit light, which is not something a singularity can do. If you take away the event horizon and the black hole surrounding the singularity, then it would be completely invisible.
>>16895344black holes are quark starsdark matter is quarkonium
>>16895741can you link a source where i can read about this?
