Is climatology even really a science?
It's whatever the UN's IPCC is willing to fund.
Define science, and then say how climatology doesn't meet the definition.
>>16895984No
>>16895997Science is about predicting reality, and climatology has failed to do that because it's part of a deindustrialization scheme concocted by the enemies of Europe and the United States. More carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is actually a good thing for the planet because it helps plants grow.
>>16896030>Science is about predicting reality, and climatology has failed to do thatThat's not true though. Exxon predictions from the 70's are very spot on.
>>16896026the only people who make off topics posts REEEEE'ing are autistic spergs who never get pussy and have no friends, because .... they are spastic spergs.
>>16895984>Is climatology even really a science?They have satisfied the requirement of reproducibility by repeatedly conning the public for decades.They got it down to a science.
