If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities, and... (infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and...) continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and.....(…)…
>>16896957Yeah, pure abstraction can be anything you want it to be as long as you maintain logical self consistency.People who try to shoehorn some 2deep4u philosofagging into math are retarded. It just some shit we made up.
>>16896957Andres Serrano's "Immersion (Piss Christ)", created in 1987, is one of the most famous and debated photographs in contemporary art.The photograph depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a glass container filled with the artist's own urine.
There are as many irrational numbers between 0 and 0.000000000001 as there are integers between 0 and TREE(3)
>>16897671wrong, there's already more rationals between 0 and 0.000000000001 than there's integers between 0 and TREE(3), and there's more irrationals than rationals between 0 and 0.000000000001 as per cantor's sanitorium visit
In between 0 and 1, pick TREE(3) different numbers. Now there's TREE(3)+1 gaps between the numbers you picked. Inside each gap, pick another TREE(3) numbers, and then those gaps and those gaps and those gaps. Repeat TREE(3) times. You haven't covered even 1% of all the numbers that exist between 0 and 1. And if the numbers were picked randomly, the probability that you happened to pick the number 1/2 is zero.
>>16897671There are more, actually
>>16896957People aren't infinite to themselves by mentally connecting to others' processes without a consciousness. People around me have a forced mental connection with the space over you.
>>16899302Your meds. Take them.
Relevant Stoney
>>16899310>[grey shirt]Andres Serrano identifies as a Christian and describes his work as being deeply rooted in his Catholic upbringing.He has repeatedly stated in interviews, "I've been a Catholic all my life, so I am a follower of Christ". He often identifies as a "Christian artist" and recently referred to himself as an "imperfect Catholic".
there are more surreal numbers than any of these bitches!
>>16899310Damn! that is so edgy
>>16896957Mathematically you can infinitely divide the range between any two numbers. That's math, not reality. Don't reify it.
>>16900330>reifydon't use words you fail to understand
>>16900331Doers the word confuse you zoomie?
>>16899447And?
>>16900340no but the lack of literacy in /sci/zoids does
>>16900367You seem upset.
>>16897032I mean look at the guy
>>16896957Why have you made so many posts like this?
>>16900366>And?AS = Andres SerranoC1 = the character in the 1st panelC3 = the character in the 3rd panelC1 seems to be AS.C1 = C3C3 seems to be Jewish; but AS is Catholic.
>>16900367>t. absolute retard who is clearly confused by the fact that the words schizo and schizoid sound so similar
>>16900611I’m an atheist. Debate me!
>>16896967Did you intend for this post to imply philosophy is more insightful and meaningful than math?
>>16900954>Debate me!About what? I despise the Abrahamic religions. And this is /sci/, remember?
>>16900954>Debate me!For that, you would have to create a thread in /his/.And I don't reply to posts which are NSFF (not safe for freedom).
>>16901008NFTs
>>16901228>TI know you are, but what am I?
I bet that no one reading this has ever seen a thread this edgy.
>>16899302Stop it. Get some help. :)
