>>16897035
It's hard to know how common it is or if it even has the same cause in each case.
Most people who get diagnosed with a "terminal illness" are, indeed, treated so you can't call any of those cases truly "spontaneous" even though they're often labeled as such. On the flip side we don't know how many people weren't formally diagnosed to begin with.
A lot of spontaneous remission cases with cancer follow bouts of heavy infection induced fever indicating that it may be related to some sort of immune response.

These things aren't some deep, esoteric, mystery that The Experts (tm) don't want you to know about. It's simply "biology be weird sometimes and it's impossible, even in principle, to know what actually happened in each case."

>>16897035
These never seem to have objective proof and instead rely on diagnoses provided by fallible and disinterested d*ctors..

>>16897035
>science/medicine hates talking about this
https://noetic.org/publication/spontaneous-remission-annotated-bibliography/
Here you go nigger. 3500 documented cases.

>>16897084
>the Institute of Noetic Sciences
I didn't even need to google this to know it's exactly the kind of place to find quack "research."

>>16897085
The cases are real though.

>>16897084
>noetic.org
point proven, brainlet