How strong really is the science around the theory that the universe is deterministic?Like what is the percentage likelihood that it's true based on the strength of the evidence?
>>16899957>How strong really is the science around the theory that the universe is deterministic?Extremely strong, in that non-deterministic phenomena have never been observed.>Like what is the percentage likelihood that it's true based on the strength of the evidence?About 69.420%
>>16899988>non-deterministic phenomena have never been observed.*laughs in quantum*
>>16900044Laughs in quantum, indeed. Nothing in quantum science provides evidence that the universe is non-deterministic when you look past pop-philosophy.
>>16900044*laughs in superdeterminism*
>>16900048What causes a particular atom to decay when it does?
>>16900067Ask your physics professor, or judging by your maturity, your physics teacher.
>>16899957Look what I drew.I wrote the "pseudocode", and Gemini wrote the corresponding Python code. I couldn't draw the hole in the middle of the gear, because I don't know what its radius is.
>>16900067the rest of the universe, obviously
>>16900082The interior angles are π/3 and 3*π/2.
