Why have the textbooks gotten so bad lately?
>>16903548Pajeets. What else? It has been happening in for longer than a decade. AI slop just made it more obvious.Remember, india is a russia’s bitch. Pajeets are russian spies. I think they were just trying to place their agents at important positions. But forgot how incompetent and nepotistic Pajeets are. It’s really depressing what happened to Springer and other scientific publishers.
>>16903548A literate person would simply state:>The textbooks are verbose with infantile diction.The first review is an exhibit of the issue as if she was satirizing the text with her post. The second review exhibits the quintessential American view of education. The third criticizes the book for the same. Yet her composition is likely as crude as the text in question. The decline of textbook quality is a consequence of declining educational standards that began well over 100 years ago. The classical literature and linguistics which was requisite to the old aristocratic mode of education was replaced by diluted variant for commoners. The purpose of education became, especially in the American case, to produce laborers and factory workers rather than to bring up an individual to higher cultural and intellectual standards. The best of the nobility had a fine appreciation for the arts and sciences for their beauty and majesty alone. Whereas the commoner even today thinks of all things through utility and discards what according to that perspective is superfluous. They then cite a variation of the subversive proverb by the Jew Einstein to justify their simplicity. The modern man is incapable of all arts. A dullard in all ways but their utilitarian profession. No true comprehension or appreciation of the arts results in inadequate composition.
>Longer books can sell for a higher priceThat's it.
