is IQ the reason why women are outperforming men in every way possible /sci/?
>>16906714Cute bait. Most of /sci/ can't read a chart any better, though. Must be the estrogen mimickers.
>>16906717>Cute baitexcept it isn't. show that chart to any woman and tell her that the average woman is smarter than the average man and observe her reaction
Both curves are centralized on abou the same score (horizontal line), about 100this means the average is the samethe difference between the curves is that there are more average women than average men (% of population, vertical line) and less gifted women than gifted men, and less cognitively impaired women than men.
>>16906714>social media screenshot threatdeserves an automatic bananother thread to hide from the catalog with shift + left click
>>16906714Women might need a higher IQ more than ever now to catch up from those awfully repressed Middle Ages. The funny thing is if I did something quantum that advanced the male side, then I would get female presents to equalize it. You can't get too far ahead of yourselves.
>>16906714I genuinely don't know if this bitch is being serious or just ragebaiting
>>16906714Heh, the probability distribution function of male IQ doesn't even empirically follow a Gaussian distribution.The first moment is clearly not fixed at 100. It should have lower variance and negative skewness compared to the female distribution.This is pure feminist propaganda with nothing to do with science.Just a fake statistic, that's all.
>>16906714>"Average chick is smarter">Curve shows they are the same, except most midwits are femaleCase in point.
>>16906762fewer
>>16906714Women contribute to science more under patriarchy
It's the psychopathy and the lack of accountability in a woke world. Easier to manipulate as well.Next caller
>>16906714Lol
Women are more consistently intelligent than men Men are more variable. There are pros and cons to each side of this. Women will generally just be better multi-taskers. I'd generally trust a woman behind a desk or computer.
>>16906714actual proof that intelligence is literally autism
>>16906762Which makes sense because there must be a biological lower limit of IQ where the woman cannot take care of her children any more and their survival is in danger.
>>16906762>Both curves are centralized on abou the same score (horizontal line), about 100Except those aren't even accurate curves. The average for women is a few points lower, which translates to a huge difference in proportions towards the tails and boils down to women being roughly as likely to be imbeciles but highly unlikely to be geniuses.
>>16913330>Which makes senseNo, it doesn't.>there must be a biological lower limit of IQ where the woman cannot take care of her children any more and their survival is in danger.That limit is lower than the one where a man cannot take care of his woman, especially in an actual human society where taking care of children is a communal effort. Midwit normies should never be exposed to any terminology or themes related to evolution. It causes you to hallucinate like biological chatbots.
>>16913366A male fox will never mate with another female fox if his dies. A female fox will mate with another male fox if hers dies.
>>16913429You can make up retarded stories all you want but the bottom line is that your head canon makes no sense and is also empirically false because OP's chart is fake and women have a lower average IQ.
>>16913366>That limit is lower than the one where a man cannot take care of his woman, especially in an actual human society where taking care of children is a communal effort. Midwit normies should never be exposed to any terminology or themes related to evolution. It causes you to hallucinate like biological chatbots.You realise that all our DNA is from millions of years of evolution, the last couple thousand years haven’t made a dent.
>>16913491See >>16913366>Midwit normies should never be exposed to any terminology or themes related to evolution. It causes you to hallucinate like biological chatbots.Except I amend the "midwit" remark. You're an absolute nigger-grade fuckwit.
