[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images.jpg (58 KB, 562x546)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
Are you a flat universer?

Does an infinite universe where there's an infinite amount of matter and infinite copies of you out there somewhere make sense to you? Or do you think it's flat but finite? Or something else?
>>
>>16911123
both infinite and finite universe are mind blowing
>>
>>16911123
An infinite Universe doesn't make any sense.
>>
>>16911558
This. Infinity does not exist in nature. Instead the universe is simply really, really, really big.
>>
>>16911123
>"the universe is pear-shaped"
its not "curved"
that's just stupid allegory for gravity effects

science are so fucking stupid and use the stupidest fucking ways to try and explain something.
>>
File: Gyroid_MinimalSurfaces.jpg (579 KB, 826x826)
579 KB
579 KB JPG
>>16911123
I would prefer a gryoidal universe, one small enough to see the curvature localy.
>>
File: 1652772152095.jpg (103 KB, 1100x825)
103 KB
103 KB JPG
>>16911123
If there are an infinite number of copies of me out there, does that mean there is a copy of me that is specifically looking to track and kill me and all other copies of it?
>>
>>16911652
yes
>>
>>16911562
what if you went in one direction faster than light you eventually end up back at the starting point, but because of this speed limit we're forever constrained riding this wave of existence that repeats itself over and over but to us it would be infinite
>>
>>16911562
>Infinity does not exist in nature
imagine being this blissfully ignorant
>>
>>16911123
There's no solid reason to rule out flat but bounded. Theorists tend to want to do so because they want to avoid thinking about the laws of physics at the boundary, but that's not a legit argument against something. "Oh no the math would be messy and I dont know anything at all about this well then it cannot be"
profoundly inane thinking
>>
>>16911725
Give an example of one then.
>>
>>16911558
>>16911562
two brainlets agreeing
>>
>>16911804
every quantum field theory. fields are omnipresent, as they extend to infinity.
>>
>>16911870
> theory
you are talking about some math, not physical reality.
>>
>>16912081
no i'm not. the math is gauge theory. fields and potentials are their physical manifestation. you mas well say forces and objects are just math if you're going to be this absurd.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.