(Sorry for mistakes, I am not from England or USA) I invented actually how to travel at the speed of light. The idea is reaching the limit of photons pher small amount of space. If we have 2 phonons (y) with energy that equals to mass of electron (≈1.02 MeV) (E=mc2) we can collide photon (it is not actual collision, but idk how to explain) . They will generate electron-positron pair (e- — e+). In regular condition they will annihilate and turn into photons again. It is complex process, and requires collision with 90° angle. But there is better way to generate the pair. We can make system of rays. There is two rays of photons. The main ray have extremely high energy. The second one is our activator. They move far in the space (almost perfect like ) but with little angle (it is so small that they have days or month to collide). After collision we generate electron-positron pair (positron is anti-electron). The momentum of particles is forward, and energy is enough not to annihilate and move on normal distance. But it is only 2 useless particles. To solve this problem we have to launch millions of ray systems like this and one with bigger energy. This is going to generate chaos of e-–e+ pairs. But it will generate one pion (made of u quark and anti-d quark). It will have positive charge, so it will push away positrons (antimatter) and make electrons move in one trajectory. Is it all the potential? Maybe no. We can try to do the same with protons and antiprotons (just make energy of photons bigger), neutrons and antineutrons, combine them
>>16911601It took you this long? I do this every morning lol.
I think you need to run it by ChatGPT. Turn it into a bowl of nice math slop.
You invent only one possible way to move at the speed of light with all calculations (I'm not gonna give you my calculations, it is secret) ??
>>16911601>one trajectorySo you only do it in one direction instead of all 12 simultaneously? Is this some kind of kindergarten science fair project or something?
>>16911778>all 12lol looks like someone only has one time axis
>did u prove this experimentally?
