>Google: AI proof jobs>The general human consensus: “Anything which requires hands and is on-site”These poor fools have no idea what’s coming nextAsimov was right except the government doesn’t care about the three rules of robotics
>>16917141>AI Proof JobsAnything that requires reasoning is "AI" proof.
>>16917148>Mobile human like Robits can’t come to your house and change the plumbing systemGive it 20 years
>>16917150>"AI" believer is literally schizophrenic and talking to the voicesEvery single time.
>>16917153>”GRUG SAY CARS NO DRIVE THEMSELVES. THAT DO HANDS AND BE AT PLACE. BIG BRAIN NEEDED TO MAKE BIG THOUGHT.”You’re evil or stupidGo read a book instead of 4chan
>>16917157>psychotic retard simply continues lashing out at the voicesAn accurate representative of all "AI" believers.
>>16917158I’m helping you learn, I love to help the robits learn you inflammation upon humanity
Psychotic patient therapy session aside, anything that requires reasoning is "AI" proof.
>>16917161I trust an AI doctor that instantly knows my full medical history over a doctor with a fucked up life of his own that he can’t figure out and live happily inAn AI Doctor that remembers everything he learned while studying at every medical school known to humanity (public and private)Soon.Have a good day and don’t forget to pray to God.
>I trust an AI doctor>Soon.Soon indeed. And good riddance with your subhuman lot.
>>16917169>is scared of the auto-doc
>>16917141>three rules of roboticskinda stale, like the turing testhurr durr an invasive species is hogging/taking/stealing the foodwhat do we do?
They said machinists would be out of a job when CNC was first introduced. Guess what faggot?
>>16917277Another faggot, here's a kys for youHyperbolic strawman
>>16917294Did you try reading your AIslop screenshot?
>>16917301Focus on the numbers, not the parroted hand-waiving. And that is before AI so I would expect further decline.
>>16917318I'm focusing on the fact that your AIslop screenshot doesn't contradict the post you're trying to "refute". Did you try reading it before you posted it?
>>16917320The jobs are declining. They were declining since the CNC. We are just adding AI so I expect more of the same. I am done with you.
>>16917323What an absolute retard
>>16917323>The jobs are declining.I'm sure CNC machines will operate themselves in exactly Two More Weeks but your AIslop screenshot does not refute >>16917277
>>16917330clarify pleasewhat is not being addressed?Do you need to see all machinists out of a job?Or is per capita beyond your hue?Imagine the AI hell world where the machines just keep 1 human of each profession as a zoo exhibit to do fake work just to satisfy your retarded metric. You'll still be saying they're not all unemployed as if it means anything to anybody.Blackpill: humans suffer from alignment as well
>clarify please>what is not being addressed?>Do you need to see all machinists out of a job?>Or is per capita beyond your hue?>Imagine the AI hell world where the machines just keep 1 human of each profession as a zoo exhibit to do fake work just to satisfy your retarded metric. You'll still be saying they're not all unemployed as if it means anything to anybody.>Blackpill: humans suffer from alignment as well
>>16917359nice argument
>>16917361Your schizophrenic delusion about token guessers making humans obsolete in exactly Two More Weeks is not a subject for debate.
k
ignore the deniers, there's no saving them. it doesn't matterthe only ai-safe jobs are those where people are THE point. i don't think even sex work qualifies. however, the politics, law making, guidance in general, that i believe is safe in societies that won't give up to the machines completely. also, alignment and overseeing the machines, whether they are doing what is asked, what needs to be done, and doing it correctly in the acceptable way. i don't think that can be completely delegated to other machines, as the question of alignment will always persist. that's the long term outlook
>>16917359There is a SHORTAGE of skilled machinists. Just because hurr durr number went down, that doesn't mean the jobs are no longer needed. The ai slop you posted states as such. Ai will have it's place but it will be replacing midwits like you.
>>16917445THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF EVERYTHING ALWAYSwant more, offer to pay more
>you know this>to survive u have to think different>do what u do but do it 4 real
