>>16918350
My axiom is that I'm always right, so that proves I'm always right.
>t. expert online debatelord

>>16918353
You need axioms to reason at all.

>>16918350
If you're right, then you're right. That's sensible enough but not very interesting.

>>16918354
But you cannot use an axiom to demonstrate the axiom's validity. The axiom is either accepted a priori or it isn't.

>>16918368
>you cannot use an axiom to demonstrate the axiom's validity
Yeah. So?

File: logic gates, a concept te(...).jpg (84 KB, 1600x1333)

84 KB JPG

>>16918350
Maybe in 1500 years, you philosophykeks will figure out how to add numbers using logic. Then you narcissistic math dropouts with fancy english degrees pretending to be smart, will be where CS was 100 years ago.

>>16918476
Formal logic is math not philosophy.

>>16918532
It lierally is not and you are super wrong. Google "why math cannot be reduced to logic"

Or just look up Godel.

Or just fucking argue with me like you're about to do because you're fucking retarded.

>>16918535
>Godel
NTA but thanks for reminding me to update my filter. 'Gödel' is already in there but it didn't occur to me that morons like you, who can't even spell it right, would still invoke Gödel.

>>16918547
because why the fuck would I bother to type it like that you stupid nigger, everyone knows what is being said and I'm not a eurofag with some dvorak keyboard or whatever the fuck you slavs use to troll null sec gangs with in eve online

>why the fuck would i know how to spell things hurrrrrrr
>formal logic is not math because math can't be heckin' reduced to formal logic
>look up heckin' goodel
Some real mouth-breathing, tar-black gorilla niggers on this board today.

>>16918554
no I didn't say I didn't know how to type it I said why the fuck would I? fucking kill yourself faggot

And keep being a fucking idiot taking every scrap of bait you stupid nigger, I'm sure people wasting their time reading this stupid thread will think you're the smart one right?

Tar-black and stupid
The gorilla nigger posts
Please help me, moonman

>>16918353
My axiom is that i'm always wrong, including this axiom.

>>16918583
liar's paradox moment