i'm so sick of slop physics videos saying that heisenberg's uncertainty principle "prooooves" that [insert some crazy multi worlds parallel dimension woo woo qantum fizziks new ayyyje bullshit]what "the math proves" is simply that the math is wrong. iow the model is wrong. pls stop the cringe insanity.
>>16918969>the math is wrongThen why does it correctly predict the structure behind directly observable physical outcomes?
>>16918969All it proves is that not every process in nature is deterministic. That much should be obvious to you, who made an irrational choice against all selection pressures to type out and post this dumbass thread.
>>16919077>All it proves is that not every process in nature is deterministic... under certain unprovable assumptions that QM can actually live without.
>>16918969The woowoo shit is gay. But the uncertainty principle can be directly observed at macro scales with the naked eye. It's not some mathematical aberration. It really is a phenomenon in the physical world.
It is constraint measures ie, one will exclude another, pretty common in non-qm but we don’t call it that
>>16918969Its literally just a relationship of error bounds when transforming between frequency and time domain. That's all it is. Nothing woowoo voodoo about it. It is a fool's errand to try ascribing a deeper meaning to the math we use to describe and predict experimental results.
>>16918973because it doesn’t. you’re still having to guess what most properties are because we still can’t accurately measure them.
>>16919212>t. mentally ill retard
