[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_9155.jpg (51 KB, 578x1024)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
If you don’t treat nature or science as magical, then you don’t truly love or appreciate nature or science, do you?
>>
>>16919054
this shit thread will get to bump limit with absolute fucking retards "discussing" the "topic" and seething at eachother, great
>>
>>16919054
If you don't treat your mom as magical then you don't love your mom. She will die tonight if you don't reply to this post acknowledging the magic of moms.
>>
>>16919054
>pretending to understand nature
wow
>>
>>16919074
I <3 my mom despite all the insanity she brought into my life
>>
>>16919054
Define magic
>>
>>16919350
Acausal effects
>>
>>16919054
"Magic" and "science" are two sides of the same coin.
>>
>>16919384
>Acausal effects
By this definition, all of reality is magic, which makes the distinction pointless.
>>
>>16919595
Post the other version of this image
>>
>>16919617
Yeah
>>
Magic is the chemistry in the brain making you go “wow”
>>
The stars are magic
>>
Math is magic
>>
>>16919062
Wrong.
>>
quack
>>
my own ignorance feels magical sometimes, especially when it comes to realizing how far away true insight is from just regurgitating preconceived notions.
>>
>>16919054
Based duck
>>
Sure
>>
haha funny ducky
>>
I like how one loser kept bumping this thread for a month without getting any replies
>>
Science as an art is kind of just the evolved form of magic, a lot of the early scientists also studied alchemy and tried to predict the rapture. These pursuits were themselves evidence based and could be applied practically to some extent much like modern science, they were just clueless compared today.
>>
>>16933062
*somewhat evidence based
certainly wasn't as rigorous or adhered to as today
>>
The history of the universe as described by the modern sciences depicts a profoundly creative universe that has continually expanded its possibilities beyond what was previously possible. The early universe was too hot and dense for even atoms to form, when it expanded and cooled enough it made possible the formation of stars in galaxies. The first generations of stars forged the heavier elements that made the formation of rocky planets like Earth possible, which made life possible. The universe famously has a trend of "increasing complexity" which means "significance of elements to each other." Human history has followed this trend until we've reached a threshold where we will either overcome the forces keeping us divided, or be consumed by them. A trend is not a guarantee, nor does it follow a simple route of linear progress.

The universe is a community of co-creators, a massively co-participatory art project.

The wills to explore, create, discover and love are an extension of this "Eros of the universe" and the impulse of life. Scientific inquiry is absolutely sacred.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWnA4XLrMWA



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.