[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Can someone explain to me like I am a dumb fucking retard, which I am, where the fuck does the energy come to turn a proton into a fucking neutron in this reaction :

[math]\ce{p + p \rightarrow d + e^+ + \nu_e}[math]

I know that the interaction balance out in the end because of the binding energy of the deuteron that gets released, but while the deuteron doesn't fucking exist yet, an Up quark has to turn into a Down quark, which is heavier, so where the fuck does the energy come from if it isn't released yet.
>>
>>16919287
you’re thinking about it like the up quark has to "pay" the mass difference before anything else happens, but that’s not how the reaction works. the process is one single quantum transition from two protons to a deuteron plus a positron and a neutrino. energy conservation applies to the whole initial and final states, not to some imaginary halfway point. the total mass-energy of two free protons is higher than the total mass-energy of the deuteron plus the emitted particles, and that difference covers everything, including the u -> d conversion
>>
>>16919289
So that Feynman diagram is just one contribution to the amplitude of the interaction and doesn't mean anything beside "most probable virtual stuff that happen internally but could be anything else" ?
>>
>>16919577
yes that's it. a feynman diagram is just one term in the perturbative expansion of the total quantum amplitude, it's not a literal sequence of physical events happening in time.

the internal lines W+ do not represent real particles with well-defined energies, so there is no stage where a quark must “pay” a mass difference first. only the total initial and final states must satisfy energy conservation.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.