Bros it’s fucking possible, we can all go back eventually
>>16921137Copenhagen interpretation issue where they insert in nonsensical collapse
>>16921137wtf is a temporal slit? They gaped time open and shined a flashlight through it?
>>16921148I think OP might be referring to this:Scientists find proof time travel is real and happening now.https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/scientists-find-proof-time-travel-is-real-and-happening-now/ar-AA1WFdjOIt is something to do with faster than light time reversible wave packets in a metamaterial.
>>16921204>faster than light time reversible wave packets in a metamaterialSo they're misinterpreting the results. Got it.
>>16921148Think of it like a time goatse
Research into faster-than-light (FTL) time-reversible wave packets in metamaterials involves engineering materials that, when subjected to a swift, uniform change in their properties (time modulation), cause electromagnetic or acoustic wave packets to reverse their trajectory in time, sometimes creating the appearance of FTL movement relative to outside observers. These experiments demonstrate that while causality is not violated, the "wavepacket" can appear to move faster than by manipulating the space or time coordinates directly, rather than propelling matter through space. So time red-shifts to the photon after the quantum light effect.
there is nothing in GR preventing backwards light cones, in fact they're an answer to malament's theorem and why there needs not be a canonical one way speed of light to solve some "paradoxes"I'm using paradox in quotation marks because they're not actual paradoxes but people being upset with metaphysical implications of some thingsnon locality isn't a new thing either, quantum energy teleportation also exhibits tangible nonlocal behaviourthis isn't the 50s anymore, nonlocal stuff isn't very controversial because it doesn't work the way people were worried it doesif you're so inclined you can chalk it up to how things are simply statistically correlated with each and not accept that nonlocality is ontic, it's a matter of convention; tell me, does it make sense to talk about the "speed" of statistical correlation? the answer is trivialplease stop twisting physics in a way that makes normies believe in quantum esotericism and think time travel is real
Did you mean to say they found out about REFLECTION, you bantu retard?
>>16921137You will never go backwards in time. It would require more energy then the universe can produce to make it happen. It would require the universe to stop expanding outwards and start expanding backwards again. It would require Black holes to spit out what they swallowed. Supernovas to explode backward into their original state. The sun to suck up the Light it produced and The planets to start spinning backwards.It would take more energy just to stop the universe then the universe can produce and it would take atleast the power of a 100 - 1000 universes to make it go backwards.And IF You managed to build a time machine (wich You never will) and pressed the Button the machine would just instantly turn itself off again just because You went back in time to the point when You starten the machine. Because You went back in time. The only one that can go back in time is the Creator himself and he need to create more universes and use them as batteries to make it happen.The entire idea of humans traveling back in time is ultra retarded. Its like a toddler dreaming.
>>16922265Ok I guess the photon that science proved travels backwards in time is from another universe then with infinity energy or something
>>16922285Observing a particle doing something is not the same thing as going back in time.
>>16922286>observing time travel is not the same as travelling through time yourselfYawn, a thousand years ago retards like you would suck on crosses and say man will never fly. Turns out birds can fly, and we studied the mechanics behind it to create flying machines. Same concept applies here, kike.
>>16922285Do You even understand what "going back in time" means? You obviously cant even grasp the situation we're talking about here.
>>16921137This is just theater to keep the cattle swooning and engaged. The U.S. gov't is hiding time travel technology from the public because they know it will cause outrage around the world and possibly some parts of global human civilization collapsing into chaos. Same with the Vatican. Do you think time travel is this new fucking thing that science is just only discovering? The US gov has known about it since the early 20th century, and that's just the U.S. The V'can has known about it for much, much longer than that.Look up 'Chronovisor'
>>16922290We're not talking about flying here You fucking retar. We're talking about the universe moving backwards to get us to a point way back in history.I swear you're retarded
>>16922292From the article>The reflected wave was a time-reversed copy of the original, meaning it carried the same spatial information but propagated backward through the time dimensionThat’s time travel you retard
>>16922295Dude i swear you're retarded.
>>16922294You’re dumb as hell. Clearly we don’t need infinite energy or the universe to move backwards or black holes spitting things out or any of that dumb shit you’re talking about since the scientists didn’t have access to that and still got those results.Just stop posting.
>>16922297Reversing time is the same thing as rewinding things that happened. To rewind happenings You need to play back time. To play back time You need to make the universe go backwards intill the point wherr it didnt happen. Reality is not fucking world of warcraft You imbecille.
>>16922297Dude i swear you're a mongoloid. We should cull People like You just to improve humanity
>>16922305>>16922308You seem to be mindbroken that scientific experiments don’t agree with your insipid theory. Not even Einstein agrees with you btw
>>16922315This guy think reality is a fucking DVD that you can rewind and start over as you wish.Someone call the psych ward. This guy needs a straitjacket.
>>16921148just a double slit that changes WHEN a photon will go through it instead of wherethis can be done simply by delaying the light from one of the slits of a traditional double-slit. eg, have two fiber optic cables connected to the two slits, but one of them is much longer than the other.then to see temporal interference, you simply check if sometimes you see the photon earlier/later than expectedyou can also check if there tend to be set times at which the photon arrives (like how there are set places in a traditional dse where the photon might be detected)
>>16921137>Light can travel backwards in timeNo it can't.>we can all go back eventuallyNope.
>>16921145Probably not this but I'll rant about it anyway. Block universe is consistent with observation and requires the fewest assumptions. Copenhagen is indeed nonsense.>Cat is in superposition of being dead and alive.>Anon opens box.>Cat-Anon system is in a superposition of cat-is-dead-Anon-thinks-it's-dead and cat-is-alive-Anon-thinks-it's-alive.>Anon goes on 4chan.>4chan is now in a deterministic state where anon acts incredulous because he failed to directly observe a superposition.
>>16923078shouldnt the 4chan-other-anons system now be in a superposition of >OP is retardedand>OP is baiting
>>16922285Time reversal and travelling backwards through time are not the same thing despite sounding like they are.If I shoot a laser at you that is reflected back as perfect copy of itself to the source that is time reversal, the beam is now self correcting. It's about entropy see?
>>16923908Another more pictoral but non physical example might be a grass fire algorithm. The same idea can be applied to 3d objects. The first concept could be applied to an incomplete object to give a completed object. Doing this in 3d would be extremely complex, but a brain can do it well enough (depth is illusory).
>>16921137Can't believe I ever took this stupid shit halfway seriously. And bear in mind I experience undeniable precognition daily. That's not the issue here.
>>16922265actually interesting points thank you for this
The idea that time is not a fundamental, flowing entity but rather a dimension, direction, or "shape" within a static 4D block universe is a prominent concept in modern physics and philosophy, particularly within general relativity and shape dynamics. This perspective suggests that all moments—past, present, and future—co-exist, making time more like a spatial coordinate.Einstein believed that the passage of time is a "stubbornly persistent illusion" and that, fundamentally, time and space are merged into a 4D, unchanging block universe (spacetime). In this view, past, present, and future exist simultaneously as coordinates in a geometric structure rather than flowing sequentially.
Gonna assume this is just buzzword bait and nothing revolutionary or breakthrough is actually happening
>>16923947Doesn't this suggest free will is a lie?
>>16923951No. It’s just a construct like anything else. A necessary illusion to function.
IS THIS NOT AT THE CRUX OF OPTICAL PHASE CONJUGATION?>>16921883>>16921204You are now reminded of "Gain Assisted Superluminal Propagation" from Nature, 1999 by LiJun Wang at the NEC Laboratory Princeton
Does this have anything to do with the recent work done by CUNY and BNL?https://www.gc.cuny.edu/news/scientists-demonstrate-time-reflection-electromagnetic-waves-groundbreaking-experiment
>particle/wave behaviourwe really need to stop using these words at some point. they've done so much damage to properly understanding quantum mechanics it's unreal.
>>16924261what makes you think that the term that replaces them won't do equal or greater damage?
>>16923948It sounds an awful lot like optical phase conjugation, but there is no phase conjugate mirror producing the reflection.
>>16924457Very good question, probably easier to redefine waves/particles so that the etymology tells the story
>>16924252Uoh
>>16922565Don't understand how's that different from phase difference
>>16921137Dude light lmao
