How come we still dont understand magnetism?
has anyone tried puttin a magnet under a microscope so they can see what's going on?
We still don't understand capacitance
>>16923042Yes, they said, there are smaller magnets further down that have to be pointed in the same direction for a stronger flow. Then they broke down crying on my shoulder. I was dressed in a clown suit and tried to cheer them up.
Seems pretty obvious to me. The universe is filled with evently distributed magnetrons which push on magnetic objects equally from all directions. Magnets consume the magnetrons creating a magnetronic void zone and the resulting magnetronic pressure imbalance pushes magnetic objects towards the magnet.
>>16923040Because near field effects are governed by Ampere/Webber electrodynamics whereas far field effects are governed by Maxwell/Heaviside. You need a theory that incorporates both.
>>16923113>governed by*modeled by
>>16923124Yes, I guess it's proper to say that.
>>16923040What do you not understand?
>>16923092The sad thing is that this is basically correct
>>16923040This can be solved with dark magnet
>>16923141Dark magnetism and dark aether are the answer 100%
ITT: highschool dropouts
>>16923141Kek
basically all of physics is just shooting things with increasingly expensive guns and seeing what happens
aharonov-bohm effect is a legit brainfuck
>i do
>>16923040jews
>>16923248it clarifies an important problem of ontology - fields aren't real, but scalar and vector potentials are
>the mathematical construct we use to more easily calculate things doesn't physically exist probably!!!oh no
>>16923301>>16923295then what the fuck is real? i can't say waves magnets or particles because those are models, or excitations of a field because fields aren't real. so nothing is real? what's the base reality that isn't a model?
>>16923040What is Gauss' law for Magnetism? Divergence of the B field of an enclosed magnet is always 0.
>>16923438I can show you something real...
>>16923438As far as I understand it, space itself is the base reality. It is a stretchable, twistable, warpable thingthen it's a matter of describing this tension in whatever ways we find convenientwe call the stretch fields and the closed loops particlestry this for a toy examplehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYyrgDEJLOAand maybe thishttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Tsnwk4HKSk
>>16923499this falls straight out of the geometry, every field line is a geodesic
>>16923438God
>>16923530men used to have such nice hair, genetics really has declined in recent decades...
>>16923040How can we understand anything if we don't completely 100% know how things operate at the most fundamental level?
>>16923529Are you saying that magnetism can be derived from purely geometric principles?
>attraction is an action>find me on youtube
>>16923604divergence of B is always zero in the case of closed magnetic field lines because closed magnetic field lines are always geodesics with respect to the magnetic field, by definitionthis is a purely geometric statement, trivially true
>>16923040This youtube channel did a good job on BA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kBlQlz_qdoand cites https://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.4611 and https://arxiv.org/pdf/0802.3721 for fluid dynamic analogues for BA
Magnets work because I tell them to.
>>16923617things are nice and sedate in the Lorenz gauge, even quieter in Coulomb gaugewhere it gets wild is where you try to deal with the full relativistic Maxwell equations where not only the scalar and vector potentials can be different for different observers as long as the relationship between them is preserved but also locality falls by the wayside
GravityMicro GravityQuantum GravityClever...very clever young man, but magnetism is actually gravity at smaller and smaller stages.......all the way down.........Or is it the other way around? I can never remember.....
>>16923661quick, /sci/, where did the momentum of that first falling piece go?and if you say "into the ground" I will beat you with my shoe, so help me Allah
>>16923675dispersed across the higgs field
>>16923675it went into the ground, go fuck yourself and your shoeyou can fucking literally see it bounce off the ground you fucking schizo stoner
>>16923787obviously not all of it, or the pieces on the ground would not have bounced, you mong
>https://youtube.com/shorts/KVQL0cXJzI4?si=Z1F8QuKTy52fyItT
>>16923661I have long suspected gravity might be a hitherto not-understood part of the electromagnetic spectrum.Underlying the function of gravity, there is an operative action, a transmission or communication of some type of energy between objects of mass
>>16923438>what's the base realityProbably unknowable and/or incomprehensible.I mean, just what we do know is spooky enough.Atoms are almost entirely empty space - a solid block of lead is 99.999% empty space. Even macroscopic contact from billiard balls colliding is just electrons repelling each other.
>>16923628>not only the scalar and vector potentials can be different for different observers as long as the relationship between them is preserved but also locality falls by the waysidethat seems to be a crux of it, one doesn't really know due to the constant from the integration just how many times they wound around A on one side of the soleniod and dewound on the otherside, just that those quantities are balanced. If charge density maps proportionally to the mass-energy relation than the statement that the lorenz guage is the only one that puts the potentials on a causal basis seems arduous to me, by definition an impulse on a volume of charge aught to compress space-time, breaking of desymmetrizing the causal chain by the lorentz factor
>>16924559there is no need to set a gauge if you're not a mathlet
>>16923040Because the people who control your perception of it don't want you knowing what yo can really do with it and where it really comes from or they wouldn't be able to control your perception of it anymore.
>>16924565thats what i'm thinking too, if an arbitrary A is bothering the user, define the experiment better, cast away the speed of light and start doing grads and time diffs on permittivity and permeability gradients
