why didn't they do something like this at the chernobyl?
>>16928702Why would covering the uranium with shit be a good idea? You just end up with boiling radioactive shit
>>16928780to absorb neutrons and reduce the reaction rate
What would you do with 9001 tons of radioactive crap?
>>16928862They try to filter it into the oceans. Recently ESP has alerted me to China causing radioactivity with its waste. I wouldn't trust anyone with waste.If you are against the war with Russia, they have an ESP vision where army men turn up at your doorstep and dump a large amount of new waste as the byproduct of the war outside your home. Then give you the stare; that's what it means. It happened to me.
>>16928783Shit wont do any of that.
What if we did this but with OP instead of Chernobyl?
>>16928702They did exactly that. Huge portions of the ruins were flooded with concrete. Just poured it right in there. Personally I think they should have kept going and just created a concrete mountain over it.
>>16928702when I saw the thumbnail all small I thought you had drawn Schrodinger's cat, and I was like "damn boy, you want to make the whole city of Pripiev both dead and alive at the same time?
They didn't have robots back then. The turbo sucker guy would've gotten it as bad as the other cleaners around the site.
>>16928910They also dumped tons of crap from helicopters over the site.
>>16928982They did have robots back then. The electronics were fried because of the radiation.>"The most eye-opening thing is the cold fact that much of the Soviet enterprise was undertaken with human force, where it was clearly within the capability of robotics," says William ("Red") Whittaker, a Carnegie Mellon robotics researcher who heads the university's Field Robotics Center and advised the Soviets through some of the Chernobyl cleanup. "It's not like they needed magic or technology that was beyond the reach of what we were doing. It was really a matter of bringing that technology to bear." Although the Soviets did use some West German and Japanese robots with limited success, no U.S. machines took part in the cleanup.>The Soviets used about 60 remote-controlled robots, most of them manufactured domestically within the U.S.S.R. Although several designs were eventually able to contribute to the cleanup, most of the robots quickly succumbed to the effects of high levels of radiation on delicate electronics. Even those machines that could operate in high-radiation environments often failed after being doused with water in an effort to decontaminate them.>But while the Soviets were discarding automation in favor of manpower, scientists at Carnegie Mellon had already perfected working prototypes of several robots that would likely have solved many of the problems at Chernobyl. Unfortunately, the machines were not available. The working prototypes were committed to the cleanup of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant - itself shut down seven years earlier after a partial meltdown - and U.S. scientists were discouraged from designing special machines for the Soviets by regulations meant to prevent sensitive technology from being passed along to countries considered a threat to the U.S.
>>16928910that was useless because the elephant foot is still melting the ground under it and will eventually leak into ground water
