[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: prl;.jpg (20 KB, 460x288)
20 KB
20 KB JPG
In a thread discussing why there are no "modern day Einsteins", anon hypothesized ideology has buck broken 21st century scientific thought.
>What is your advice for scientists trying to incur free thought and non conformity in an ever-conforming academia?
It can be anything - an experience, a book, abstination etc. Please give your insights!
>>
>>16929999
My insight is for you to kill yourself.
>>
>>16930017
Not going to happen gangstalker!
>>
indie here, don't be afraid of academia, and traditional publishing it is there for a reason

would you rather be weinstein (not published), or pearlman (arxiv) and einstein (office clerk) published
>>
File: epstein.jpg (306 KB, 787x991)
306 KB
306 KB JPG
>>16930023
I would rather be Epstein
>>
>>16930025
most people here are epsteins, some passing knowledge, no real work
>>
>>16930029
Human brain is no longer sufficient to make new discoveries or inventions. Computing and machine learning need to be developed further.
>>
>>16930033
no, it's just dogma, and outsider perspective is mostly shunned, the margin is small but progress can be made, just be patient
>>
>>16930033
>humans cant advance knowledge anymore
>ML cant advance knowledge on its own yet
>thus, humans have to advance machine learning
based retard
>>
>>16930050
What I mean is that things that would have taken 50 years to discover or invent can now be discovered or invented in just 5 years. Today, we don’t draw complex mathematical equations on paper and calculate them ourselves—we use calculators. By shifting the burden from the human brain to the machine, we relieve the human brain of that load and save time as well. We’ll soon start reaping the benefits of the investments we’re making in machine learning and computing. In other words, during this era where most things are happening rapidly and are expected to continue doing so, the human brain is lagging behind when it comes to making new discoveries and inventions. That’s what I meant by “sufficient”—we’re not stupid; we just need to accelerate our progress.
>>
File: stoney.jpg (264 KB, 1600x875)
264 KB
264 KB JPG
I never let on....
That I was on a sinking ship....
I never held back anything for the return swim....
We are on the clock boys and girls
Force it past all this slop, carve through it, burn a fiery path, leave a smoldering wake, big stepper, upon the shoulders of giants we fight to make this cosmic climb
What do you seek upon the way?
Why do you climb?
For who?
Why should the universe reveal herself to you?
With what will you do with it?
>>
One thing I really encourage anyone interested in philosophy to always keep in mind is that, nobody is going to take anything you say you believe in seriously if you only have logical reasons for believing in it, and no personal involvement in it.

What I mean is like, someone can be opposed to war in general, and have a well formed ethical argument for why war is unethical. But someone who has served a tour of duty and seen their friends get blown away has a direct, visceral reason to hate war and knows war is wrong through wisdom, not just knowledge.

Base your philosophy on wisdom, not just some trivial axiomatic reasoning. Philosophy is "love of wisdom" afterall, is it not? Not "love of knowledge". That's what science is for. They form two sides of a coin, in my opinion.
>>
>>16929999
Eliete bloodlines pushed their prodigy spawns too far too early, and they all peaked early, or wound up with too much psychological scrutiny and intervention.

Out of a very small demographic,

A percentage dulls themselves with hard drugs.

A percentage gets burnt out from ridiculous, bad training.

A percentage gets random brain damage.

The remainder is recruited by Universities and Corporations.

Only a teeny-tiny percentage slips through the cracks and is free to have their own identity.
>>
>>16929999
The sum of human knowledge used to be limited enough that it was possible for a person to be a true polymath and be an expert in every field of human knowledge that exists in your civilization.
That is literally physically impossible today. Knowledge has expanded to the point that individual hyper specific sub-sub-sub fields have more data required to fully understand them than it would have taken for someone in the renaissance to be a master of all fields of science.
And it keeps getting worse every day.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.