After all our of so called advancements humans still generally die in their 70sWhy aren't we living to 150+ by now?
it was 50 200 years agoyou are just too impatient, it's not linear, probably a sqrt growth, the last 50 years will take another 1000 years to reach
it's 80+ in first world countries without an obesity epidemic
>>16930153That's still not 150
>>16930120The research to cure the problems that cause death don't get enough funding. Or maybe the scientists working on these problems are to retarded or poorly trained to work them out. Or maybe the problems are so difficult to solve that even the most genius highly funded scientists will never work them out.
>>16930171>make nanomachine>send it in to yeet cancer cells>profit
>>16930120Because you gave yourself over to false jewish gods.
we don't have access to human specimens although that's not an excuse because we can use animals
