It may be that the universe is not expanding, but viewing far off galaxies uses limited amounts of antimatter "bandwidth" that lets us see clearly to other stars. The galaxies getting harder to see are commonly mistaken for the illusion of cosmic drift acceleration and the false conclusion that everything is drifting further apart.
Can you elaborate on your antimatter "bandwidth" concept?
>>16930199>in the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics, the vacuum is not truly empty, but a dynamic, lowest-energy state filled with fluctuating quantum fields and "virtual" particles.The "virtual" particles assist with viewing far off places. The types of quantum fields in a space vacuum are "anti-matter" as predicted by the SM; the opposite of quantum fields that exist merely through the act of observing them, the "bandwidth" that is available to view other places in the galaxy is related instead to how many times they have been observed, proven by the illusion of universal acceleration being mistaken for differences in distance instead of the resistance of the antimatter theorized to be present there with the light signature data consumed during observation. >If this is true then all celestial objects of regular observation throughout the span of human history would have gradually heightened opacity and eventually have vanished. >This effect could explain explain all aspects of the cosmos based on perception and the amount of antimatter in between any celestial objects.
Consider that even the phases of the moon would adhere to this concept, with a full moon being caused by the lack of use of the antimatter bandwidth by the majority of the human population and a crescent moon being caused by an abundance of virtual particles in the line of sight of the majority of the world population since it exists predominately on one side of the world's elliptical orbit. >I theorize that in order to see or perceive any object anti-matter must be present in order for it to be perceived.>Consider that anything that receives sufficient and constant attention from the majority of humankind disappears. The examples of this on Earth are endless; Jesus, Elvis, COVID, toilet paper, the USSR, the Apollo space program, etcetera...
>>16930199Hi Dede, basically all of this postulating came from wondering what an undiscovered opposite of the "observer effect" in physics on may be, or what effects not observing something has on it's measurements in our normal space-time dimension even if such an effect would remain "undiscoverable" due to it's nature.
>>16930430Ooh, I see. Then during an eclipse, the lack of antimatter bandwidth of the Moon (which really is an imbalance of matter bandwidth) would collide with the antimatter bandwidth of the Sun that is hidden (and therefore cannot be observed), resulting in a massive outburst of light (that we mistake for the coronal glow).
>>16930481Yes.It could explain alot of other things, like the reason the solar corona is so hot and bright is because it is difficult to look at, resulting in an abundance of antimatter in those 94 million miles; and the reason the moon becomes transparent is because life on Earth's attention has depleted the antimatter in those 238,900 miles causing the virtual particles to obscure the energy that was visible through the antimatter in space.
