If everything ends forever, that is still infinity.If it doesn't end forever, then eventually it continues, forever. Either infinity exists or it exists. Can anyone refute this logic?
null is not the opposite of infinityeat shit retard
>>16930239>mf presupposes the end of all things>mf still assumes there'll a structure left for all the things to not-exist in
>>16930239>if i repeatedly add 1 to something it somehow becomes infiniteno it does not chud
>>16930470what if i do it a non-finite amount of times?
>>16930239>If everything ends forever, that is still infinity.see that's where you0r argument fails, for ending is within the everything, so even ending ends at some point