[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1773269251937023m.jpg (94 KB, 1024x572)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
Nothing makes sense.
Subatomic particles are too complicated to be the building blocks of the universe.
Nobody has ever explained what space expanding really means.
Nobody knows if space has an edge.
The universe is too big for any entity to travel from one end to the other EVER because it expands faster than C lol.
>>
>>16931870
Not really.
If nothing makes so much sense to you, why would subatomic particles be the building block instead of nothing?
Space expanding means that every mass that appears to be staying relatively still is actually getting further apart.
If nothing made sense to you, you know that is where the edge lies.
Why would there be a universe if nothing rather than one (uni) is the building block?
>>
>>16931951
OP isn't saying nothing makes sense. They're saying nothing makes sense.
>>
>>16931974
Either way, they clearly aren't applying that idea to the rest of their post.
>>
Obviously Nobody knowing all of Nothing is what caused the necessity for change, which caused the big bang.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.