It's fucking over. People on other forums are unable to understand the difference between the word "potential" used in a physics sense and "potential" used in the way it is commonly used in casual conversation. And get uppity about it.>he has the potential to hit 40 home runs this season!>the explosive potential of this liquefied natural gas is this
actually there's at least a weak equivalence between all uses of any given word, you're just autistic
>>16932066>unrealized ability to do workLooks like the normies understand it just fine. The casual concept is a predicate and the formal is necessary but that's generally how casual and formal notions differ because casual concepts refer to much more complex real life systems while formal concepts are limited to simple and easy to understand toy models.
>>16932066they can't even understand "well regulated" in the 1700s vs "well regulated" in their modern day radical leftwing government bootlicker tongue
>>16932109What's the equivalence between the pot you cook in and the pot you were obviously smoking when you made this post?
>>16932249Either can get you cooked
>>16932066>this person has the potential to hit 40 home runs, but hasn't yet>this force has the potential to do work, but hasn't yetwhat's the problem?
OP is unable to comprehend this abstraction. Sad.
>>16932066You have to get over it. Words can have different meanings in different contexts. For example, the word "whale" has a certain meaning when used colloquially, but when used by biologists it means "large fish".
>>16932066The person who made this thread is unable to articulate the difference they are complaining other people don't understand.Its totally not projection, though, they just didn't need to explain the difference to know that other people don't understand the difference.
>>16932066my balls are full of potential.
>>16932066this board can't handle highschool level jargon without getting uppity about it because it is populated by know-nothing dropouts.You would need a skill filter to fix that
>>16933565demonstration by ontology. You are the retard that doesn't get it. Thank you for your service.