retard here. is gravity a force or what? i thought it was just the curvature of spacetime. doesn't that make it fundamentally different from the three other forces? so why are all these nerd scientists trying to unify the four?
>>16932280I think gravity is just some vector in the space-time coordinate system o algo
Maybe we just need more forces, not less....Like the force that moves between the strong and weak nuclear forces, the middle nuclear force, and maybe like a force carrier to move in between nuclear and electro magnetic force to bridge the gap....and a force between electro magnetic and gravity...The ElectroGravitational force. and the Nuclear to electro magnetic force. We just need more forces and more names for those forces is all. Trust me, science will get much easier once we find the next couple of dozen forces and identify them with new names and new symbols to represent them. Then we will need forces for in between all of those forces to connect them all together, so there will be plenty of new forces to discover and receive awards for discovering them, naming rights, patents, copyrights, book deals, speaking tours, prizes, awards, movies...we might even get The Goose to play you in the movie biopic if you find a good one....
Spacetime with planck-scale wormhole tunneling would centralise gravity
>>16932280Yeah, that's what I thought to, and also came to the conclusion that you only had to unify the three, as well as thinking that spacetime was more of a precondition for them because it encapsulates the entire universe, which other three don't.But gravity has an measurable effect, its a direct consequence of spacetime curvature, rendering it a force.I also don't know why the omnipresent force of Dark Energy isn't considered fundamental; it literally permeates everything, but I guess it doesn't aid in the construction of fundamental particles like gravity does at the subatomic levels, which is why a theory of quantum gravity is necessary to unify the four.If someone could help a tard out, that'd be cool.
>>16932280the other forces exist in space, gravity is space itself, that's the difference. that's why rovelli had to discard modern ideas of space and go back to ancient greece ideology to create it's theory of quantum gravity
>>169322803D image of the universe is just what makes sense to our mind, not what the universe is bound by. Just as the colors are conventions for our eyes and mind, and not a structure of reality.
>>16932280In Newtonian Mechanics gravity is a force.In General Relativity gravity is not a force.If Quantum Gravity is a thing, gravity would be a force.
>>16932280I touched one squished against my field while imagining physics. It looked clear with a downward arrow inside (from me angling it). Immediately a mentally energetic woman from outside in the world could see me and started to talk to me about very highly detailed secret of mine. Totally mind reading. Gravity particles cause an effect of the field trying to single them out.
>>16932280Depends what you mean by 'force'. If you mean that mathematical quantity corresponding to a relative change in momentum, then it looks like a force.
some guy with a phd says it's not a force, therefore it's not a force. simple as.https://superposer.substack.com/p/gravity-is-not-a-force
>>16932280it causes acceleration so it has to be a force
It’s not a force and qm is pseud shit that gets astroturfed to cover for the actual UFT which got classified in the 50s
