[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1749667622524766.jpg (204 KB, 2048x1798)
204 KB
204 KB JPG
Should violating the 4 Laws of Thermodynamics be considered a sin?
>>
>>16932672
The botting of the internet and its consequences...
>>
>>16932672
The laws of reality were created by Yaldabaoth to trap our souls in kenoma so he can feed on our suffering, so violating them is of the greatest moral goodness.
>>
>>16932672
Gibberish!
>>
>>16932703
That is a pretty good though
>>
>>16932672
we are all saints then
it's a rather optimistic take
>>
File: 1613926061664.png (40 KB, 392x200)
40 KB
40 KB PNG
>>16932674
>>
You're saying the church will excommunicate me if I invent a perpetual motion machine to generate energy?
>>
>>16932817
The church will excommunicate you if you claim to invent a perpetual motion machine, because you will be lying, which is a sin. A mortal sin if you bilk people for money on that scheme.
>>
>>16932818
but what will they do if I actually do it and am not lying?
>>
>>16932819
You'll get assassinated by Exxon
>>
>>16932672
What about a 5th law of Thermodynamics?
>>
>>16932829
faggot
>>
I worship science
>>
it should be a crime
>>
Why should we obey the first law of conservation when the universe already breaks it by deleting energy through redshift and printing out new energy via dark energy? Seems like a double standard if you ask me
>>
>>16932672
Your mother didn't think so.

>>16932703
Impressive thought. Maybe it's an illusory physical manifestation as feedback on the surrounding forces. That's why there's never a gap in quantum mechanics.
>>
>>16936488
i accept your concession
>>
>>16932672
Only the 2nd, .... and even then only for midwits.

They're less laws then they are observations of our or general position in spacetime and scale relative to our constituent parts.
>>
>>16937738
>Indian debate syntax
>>
>>16937738
Huh?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.