How do they prevent old and demented top secret scientists from leaking nuclear weapon plans, secret coating recipes, ufos etc.?
>>16933398Neural implants that will disregulate their brain if a certain synaptic pattern, where the information is encoded, activates, resulting in either a heart attack or complete brain death.>t. glowie
>>16933398Many secrets leak; some people get caught leaking.
Just don't have you name published or other nations abducted you. Citizens are not free with capitalism.
It's all fake and gay anyway.
Fission and fusion definitions wereswapped a few months ago maybe 5.
>>16933658A) ProofB) Meds. Now.Take your pick.
>sir, we successfully gathered intelligence from this senile Manhattan project theoretician>we are ready to build a 80 year old design nuke>we need 83 hippos, 90% enriched camembert and a covefe
>>16933398The old guys don't leak, but they do get a little looser with their hot takes. I was at a fusion conference a few years ago and ended up at a table with this old guy who worked on the H-bomb program. No secrets, but he was *very* adamant in his opinion that we should detonate an H-bomb every 5-10 years to make sure third world countries don't forget how badly we could fuck them up.
>>16933403There's no need to send them to the grave. Just incapacitate their motor circuits temporarily with a short voltage spike, send out a retrieval signal, collect them so they can continue their research.Also, there is no 100% way to prevent government secrets from leaking without eliminating the human element.
>>16933398I'm 10 clinics higher than MK Ultra....... Does that help?
>>16933398Most of those aren't really a secret they are just a technically challenging and costly thing to make
>>16933869I'm convinced someone figured out a really easy way to make them, they just don't want all kinds of interesting groups to have one
>>16933398The ability to construct a nuclear weapon, for example, is more in the scientists and engineers with the expertise, than in the plans.
>>16933398By flooding the zone with nonsense so that any information outside the official narrative through official channels is considered insane and not taken seriously.
>>16933398They split up the scientists into smaller tasks and won't let them communicate between the lines. It's then hidden in the files.
Nukes aren't that difficult to conceptualize from first principles.Building them is hard.
They don't. They can't even keep spergs from spewing shit on War Thunder forums to win internet fights.
Why would they need to? No hard evidence exists. They have done an extremely good job covering it up. They even removed the link between epstein and aliens and nobody even asks about it. The babble of demented secret government workers is drowned in the sea of ufo lifes.
My guess:Mostly preventative meaures: silo'ing people & knowledge so that most people don't get access to a full view of any system beyond their immediate scope, like the lottery software devs. And by not making it such a point of failure. Can't rely on info accessed by humans to not be circulated, but one can maybe minimize the risk of unauthorized access being a risk of some fallout. Otherwise, whack a mole, deal with each case as the prop up. We're humans and life is messy
>>16933398simple. Nukes don't exist.
>>16935799but then who was Hiroshima
>>16933666Exactly. This is why you trust the documentation.And the problem remains that the documentation is going to have massive gaps. Such as how to bore in the surface finish, all the extra steps with dealing with your chemical supplier, how your chemical supplier sources and work, Or even worse:You get papers specifying nozzle models for rockets, but no idea on how they where derived or tested. And without a running production line, you can't actually do live testing, it has to be super slow lab + order stuff. And of course the class as seen in Falling Down: A lot of the steps in the incremental process of the Military Industrial Complex is redundant, and at the end the only thing that matters is that you get a few hundred missiles in stock, while the desk jockey is completely expandable to the bottom line so long the facrory works.
>>16933398a lot of that is pointless if you don't have the technical base to build it. everyone knows the theories behind nukes, not everyone can physically implement them. it's like stealth. all those equations were worked out by the russians but they couldn't implement them. the us could.
