to check if someone is above 130 IQ /sci/?hard mode: no midwit answers
writing to IQ estimator
You should be able to tell intuitively how smart someone is after 1 minute of conversation
You should try and kill yourself. If you survive, you have over 130 IQ. Go ahead, try it.
Just eat their brain. Mensa brains taste more tangy. Like sucking on a battery.
>>16934894This only works if the "You" has decently high intelligence and isn't bogged down by poor social skills. I agree though. On social media, one or two replies in a thread is all that's needed to figure out if someone is a mindless golem or is thoughtful/has an active mind.
you can't tell this if you yourself are low iq, at least not without significant effort, but one way to do it is if you hate or dislike the person, if they stay rent free inside your head then they're probably more intelligent than you are, if you are within that range, it should be easy to tell
>>16934894Really smart people don't paint a target in their backs showing off their IQ. They just pretend to be lucky or blessed.
>>16935071Being born a really smart person and raised in an environment that encourages and fosters it does come down to luck and blessings, though.
>>16934863if he posts shit bait threads? dead giveaway, subzero IQ and addicted to sucking cocks too
>>16934863See if they can derive energy from motion without looking it up while explaining what all the intermediate derivations are.
>>16934863If you post on 4chan you definitely aren't.
>>16934863if i get along with them without htinking they're an idiot
>>16935057>if you hate or dislike the person, if they stay rent free inside your head then they're probably more intelligent than you areretard alert
>>16934894that doesnt explain what the intuition is
>>16934894Not remotely true.Very smart people often either struggle socially or purposefully distance themselves.After 1 minute of talking to a very smart person you probably will be able to tell barely anything about them at all.Meanwhile a very charismatic person will likely be good at faking outward intelligence in these short bursts giving people a much more favorable impression at first glance.High quality deception itself takes a certain level of intelligence but certainly not a genius level.
>>16934863They just have that look in their eye, or more specifically you can see it in how they look at things around them.
>>16934863see if they are they JQ cognizant
>>16935109>luck and blessingsTired of this leftist drivel.>born high IQThat's because of my superior genes>raised in a good environmentBecause my community is homogeneous and its members have superior genes.Period.
>>16935475yeah, that's not really true. their social skills are mostly dependent on the environment in which they were raised. a lot of people think that because no one likes them they must be smart. no, you're just not a likeable person, period. when i was doing my bachelors the smartest undergrad had actual social skills and was a pretty cool guy and the midwits who thought they were smart did not. and that was mainly because their parents spent their entire lives telling them they were smarter than everyone else so they were basically just sperg retards.
>>16935672>Tired of this leftist drivel.You chose your parents?>That's because of my superior genesYou chose your genes?>Because my community is homogeneous and its members have superior genes.You chose your community?>PeriodYou're on your period? You do sound like a bitch.
>>16934863Administer the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale or an equivalent test.
>>16934863
They don't use the word "midwit".
calculate the integral of the composition (7-x)^(5e^2x) between 3pi and 7pi/4if this is not hard enough, do it but for positive numbers only and transfer to polar coordinates
>>16936707sorry, pi/3 not 3pi3pi is way too easy since anything over 2pi doesn't need to exist in a calc equation
>>16936707>>16936708what if no one taught them mathematics?
>>16936709Even a midwit can get a textbook and teach themselves. I know several people who can at least get halfway with this problem without any math education beyond trig.
>>16936724What if they never had access to any textbooks? >Even a midwit can get a textbook and teach themselves. I know several people who can at least get halfway with this problem without any math education beyond trig.Well then it doesn't answers OP's question about IQ does it?
>>16936727>What if they never had access to any textbooks?myopenmath.comalternatively pic related ships $50 from Amazon, less if you get an older edition>Well then it doesn't answers OP's question about IQ does it?It does because a person with at least 130 IQ will just buy the textbook, read it, do the problems and learn calculus as I suggested above.
>>16934865NahYou can ask them to take a matrix reasoning test and if they cheat and get 120+ then they’re <70 FSIQ
>>16934863>hard mode: no midwit answersbtfo
>gym bros, if you can't bench 350 lbs you're a loser>finance bros, if you don't make 300k a year you're a loser>book bros, if you don't read 100 books a year you're a loser>academic bros, if you're not 130 IQ you're a loser>music bros, if you don't spend 5k on equipment you're a loser>gun bros, if you don't have 10 accessories on your rifle you're a loserWhat is this ubiquitous personality that plagues every enjoyable hobby or interest?
If you dont play vermintide 2 while high, you’re a loser.
>>16935109>down to luckI'm sorry anon. I think you might be a midwit.That's like thinking fishes are lucky to be born in the water.
>>16934863>to check if someone is above 130 IQ /sci/?They can provide clear explanations
>>16936729Smart <> educated
>>16937224>if you don't have 10 accessories on your rifle you're a loserThat's exactly the opposite of what gunbros say
>>16935672>>16936558B T F O
>>16934863Look at iq world map average, tells a lot.
>>16935562Chris Langan is a grifter.
>>16937505how about>if you don't ignore at least 10 gun safety rules you are a loser
>>16937505There are plenty of people who buy tons of unnecessary and expensive shit and put it on their guns. It's called Tacticool.
>>16934894Wouldn't restrict yourself minimally time-wise, but generally yea.>t.
>>16937431You are clearly below 130 IQ
>>16939002Kindness, every super smart p.hd esc. person i have interacted whit have been wery understanding.
>>16934863Ask them what a "UFO" is. If they say anything remotely having to do with aliens, they're a fucking midwife. Correct answer is, "unexplained visual phenomena in the sky" or similar.
>>16941826*midwit
>>16936707I never learned how to do integrals, and am not particularly inclined to ever do so. I think I reinvented them at some point, and promptly forgot all about it. Knowledge is disposable.
>>16934894I didn't even need one minute to judge you as below 110, since you said "smart" instead of "intelligent". And if you reply that the distinction doesn't matter I'll know you're below 105.
>>16934863Ask them to become civil, orderly and organised. If they show any confusion, then you know they are regular human cattle and you can write them off as people the universe needs developing.
ask whether they believe in god
>>16942617Get a log of this mummy's boy
>>16941035this
>>16934863>how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning?>how many 'r's are there in strawberry?
>>16937224Severe autism combined with egomania.
>>16942735>you can write them off as people the universe needs developingthat's actually a nice metaphor my dear fren
>>16935014How do you know this?>>16934863Just ask them if they use AI. If they say 'yes', then you'll know they are most definitely under 130.
>>16944686>How do you know this?I eat people's brains. Desu.
>>16936558>>16937526Obvious same fag self fellating over being snarky
