Have you ever wished you had a photographic memory? What would you memorize?
>>16935199video game physics, algorithms, utf binaries,
That's a good idea. I would learn software development too.
>>16935199Photographic memory has no utility nowadays when you can access every knowledge on the internet.
>>16935199I already have it
>>16935199i would just run vivid & lifelike mental replays of better times from my youth 24/7
Precisely the name and location of a particular meme image I'm looking for at the moment.
>>16935199When I was 13 and heavily into being a psychonaut without drugs I really delved into my own mind. From "astral projection" aka lucid dreaming, to mnemonics/n-back/corsi/memory palace, to trying to induce eureka moments and finding a recipe for such, to forcing my brain into color-grapheme synesthesia through extensive training... to even "trying to talk to collective subconscious" when I learned about it. Photographic memory is one of those things that had limited and short lived effect when I did train it. The method that worked was to sit in a dark room with single desk lamp being turned on (not directly on the desk but off to the side). And then while looking at the page of a book or something written down (on a single point, not anything specific just kind of broad view) you turn off the lamp. The after-image lingers for half a second and fades away quickly. This is the part of the brain that processes images before they come to the occipital lobe, the same nerves that pass near the temporal lobe. What you're trying to force here is connection between literal hardwires of optical nerve endings and memory part of the brain. I now have about 3 second sharp after image and about 10 seconds of blurry smudge. My memory is tremendous and I have to say that I can quickly and accurately visually remember things.
>>16935888Dude, you need a lot of existing knowledge to make a good search on the net. You also need a fair bit of insight to be able to tell what is true or playsible from the lies and fabrications on the net.
>>16935199Wait, doesn't everyone have it?
