[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_4735.png (166 KB, 573x359)
166 KB
166 KB PNG
I keep this image in my phone. Never know if it is mathematically correct.
>>
It's correct. It's a simple sum of Gaussians. You could graph it in wolfram alpha or something easily.
>>
>>16935911
You see the two boobs are connected. That's a dead giveaway she has implants
>>
Z axis is not on the same scale as the x and y axes but yes. I plotted it in desmos 3D and the titties are very flat. Multiply the whole function by 5 and it's about the same.
>>
>>16935911
Which term is the nipple and which is the boob
>>
>>16935994
The (0.1) and everything that follows is the nipple. Everything prior is boob.
That coefficient determines height (so the nipple is 1/10 the height of the boob).
The constants being added to x and y in the exponents determine position. At 0, they overlap on that axis. As it increases, you are translating each tit in opposite directions along the x or y axis respectively.
The denominator in these exponents correspond to the width of the mound. Bigger denominator = wider mound.
>>
>>16936001
>That coefficient determines height (so the nipple is 1/10 the height of the boob).
>Bigger denominator = wider mound.
Oh yeah of course that makes sense
>>
>>16935911

Have fun anon.

[code]
import numpy as np
import plotly.graph_objects as go

x = np.arange(-12, 12.1, 0.1)
y = np.arange(-12, 12.1, 0.1)
X, Y = np.meshgrid(x, y)

Z = (np.exp(-(((X+4)**2 + (Y+4)**2)**2)/1000) +
np.exp(-(((X-4)**2 + (Y-4)**2)**2)/1000) +
0.1 * (np.exp(-((X+4)**2 + (Y+4)**2)**2) +
np.exp(-((X-4)**2 + (Y-4)**2)**2)))

fig = go.Figure(data=[go.Surface(z=Z, x=x, y=y)])

fig.update_layout(
title='Interactive 3D Surface Plot',
scene=dict(xaxis_title='X Axis', yaxis_title='Y Axis', zaxis_title='Z Axis'),
scene_zaxis_range=[-3, 3],
width=900,
height=800
)
fig.show()
[/code]
>>
We've sure come a long way since writing 80085 on our calculators.
>>
>>16935994
The Higgs boson must be at the nipple.
>>
>>16936245
Yes. Now we can fire up Maple and enjoy a differentiably smooth and well defined booba
>>
File: rack test.png (217 KB, 644x513)
217 KB
217 KB PNG
>>16935911
>>
>>16935911
>>
>>16935911
this can be greatly improved. There is no boob drop, no realistic spacing
but it's a small step towards perfection
>>
Y'all keep saying it can be improved, but you don’t actually present an improved version
>>
File: predator04.jpg (317 KB, 462x400)
317 KB
317 KB JPG



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.