Have you ever discovered anything novel in math or science? or at least later discovered that your discovery was already known?
>>16935953I have discovered intriguing and novel concepts in Mathematics and will discuss them in this thread if you guys want. Years of mowing lawns and listening to audiobooks has given me the ability to think long and hard. Some of these novel concepts might now have any practical use, which is why I cam to you guysI have discovered:Inverse Prime Numbers (numbers which are not the quotients of any other real or imagined numbers)Alternating Square Theory (I explain how the difference of one square number to another is easily graphed by adding 2 to the previous difference (The (N-1)+2 rule)And Finally the masterpieceThe Logarithmic Functional IntegralI will take questions below.
>>16935953yes
>>16935977tell me about it
In my cuntry we call "buy one get one free" discounts "1 + 1 free". But you only get 1 for free, not 2. Thusly, 1 + 1 does not always equal 2.
>>16935953yeah I've been published a few timesgetting cited feels POWERFUL
>>16936025>get cited>look at their paper to see what they did>they obviously just looked at the abstract and cited it to show that they did a thorough literature reviewI don't think anyone ever read actually my papers except my advisor and MAYBE the reviewers. It's all just citations like "This topic has been widely debated in the literature [37-251]"
>>16935955>Years of mowing lawns and listening to audiobooks has given me the ability to think long and hard.What a chud thing to say.
>>16936021*sigh*, it's "1+(1 free)", bracketing is important, lest you want to end up like those retarded "viral" ambiguous formulas that involve ÷
>>16935989I don't want to
>>16936081I GUESS YOU DON'T READ?
A lot of things in biology are just common sense, that I later heard about in classes after already having thought about them myself. Such as the sexy son hypothesis, or that learning (/technology/innovation) can have an effect on evolution.
>>16936147>sexy son hypothesiselaborate
>>16936203It is bad for females to be attracted to males that other females don't find attractive, because that means her male offspring will be duds, much less likely to reproduce. Which means that her genes will be less likely to be successfully transferred to future generations than those of a female that shares mate preference with other females.It can be part of the explanation for runaway sexual selection, and explain how it is very unlikely that sexual selection for unfavorable traits will be reversed.
>>16935953I have discovered a novel link between race and IQ that is unbeknownst to academia
>>16936307This sounds like only half of the real hypothesis.The other half is incest, isn't it?
>>16936333Incest is not a part of the hypothesis.The hypothesis is just one of many explanations for mate choice.But avoiding inbreeding is another factor that plays into mate choice.I was thinking a bit further about it earlier though, and I wonder if inbreeding could be beneficial in certain cases, relating to this? I imagine the disadvantages of the trait would have to be extreme, and maybe that the preference is extreme as well. But if a female with an unusual preference has many offspring, including many female offspring that inherits that ususual mating preference, that would in theory give her male offspring someone to mate with.I don't know if the selective pressures ever work in a way that makes this preferential, but it's possible to imagine.
>>16936348Well incest is probably the most common kink in the entire species for a reason. Women moms have been encouraging their sons to have sex with eachother since time immemorial. That shit turns them on.
>>16935953I figured out some trick with arithmetic anywhere from 14-16 years ago and posted about it on this board with examples. Anons just said "huh, that's interesting, I don't know why that works". I have absolutely no memory of what I did. I was very drunk and mentally disorganized at the time and didn't care to properly document it.
>>16935953i build up an atmospheric seeing model that could be implemented with blender's built in refraction tools and mathematically demonstrated it was equivalent to more expensive volumetric modeling in the limit of weak refractionhaven't seen that anywhere else (even though phase screens have been used for a while) and was proud of my intuition and derivation
>>16936144Im currently "reading" an encyclopedia on the element table.Here, Chuddus Maximum, listen to a picture book.
>>16936144Oh, and Im only half joking. Learn "inference", then level up to "induction", add a Linguistics (Latin/Greek Thesaurus) component and that would be a robust synergy.Construct what he says and compare it with the pdf after, but I never said bridge above. Who said anything about bridges? Its about Dimensions.>McWhorterHe had the EXACT bottleneck piece of information I was looking for but the "book" (series of hour+ long lectures) in conversational structure. So he will go off on random tangets like he was chit chatting at a café. Excruciating.I bear that cross so you dont have to.
>>16936563Oops.>>16935955>concepts in MathematicsThen "reading" books on things like this, or Biology/Medical/Physics/etc, become more understandable.Thats why I would unironically, physically with a paper book, read a thesaurus or dictionary, in several foreign languages translated too. I can only speak English because I read dozens of languages that eventually blend into Physics, Biology, Pure Mathematics.
>>16936563>Learn "inference", then level up to "induction"Add an infinity cap and you got yerself a bonafide mini-mentat.
>>16936563>Construct>>16936565>n-Dimensional GeometryIs "constructed" internally.>>16936563>Learn "inference"You "infer it" through.>Transcedental Phenomenology"Parts" of "you" are taking measurments of some hierarchical structured of Physics, which on my levels of all fundemental. Higher up its more...interactive/precise in nature.An Instrumentalist of the Biological tool of Life itself.
>>16936569kys
Yes. Honestly it's extremely easy to find novel things if you're a half-competent bioinformatician
>>16936570Just add its name to your blocklist, interacting with it will only encourage it
>>16935955>I have discovered:>Inverse Prime NumbersI may have found a Pythagorus triple of transcendentals but remains in proportionality while in a cafe drinking coffee in the outskirts of Seoul. Never checked on it but posted it once or twice.You cant out Chud a Chudder, ok pal?
>>16936570How do you think people like Euler made his Identity, or Ramanujan one of his abstract equations?*Inventing* Maths is not the same as "Solving" it.
>>16935953When I was a child I noticed how the continents looked like puzzle pieces, but of course this was already known with continental drift.
Thought I had invented a new O(n) algorithm for a very specific task - previously O(mn) - and tried to patent it (I have two already). Turned out it had already been discovered in the 1960's.
>>16936572>its name>with it>encourage itIm not a "they/them"...Im a (Royal) We/Me. Totally different but its also infering the exact same thing just from a different perspective.You dont even know what "human" is, you foolish Earthling-mortals.
>>16936586What's funny is that despite how obvious it is, so obvious even a child can see it, that when someone first proposed the idea all the 'experts' in the field shot him down and called the idea ridiculous. It took something like 40 years before the theory was accepted.
>>16936573are you fucking retarded?
>>16935955>Alternating Square Theory (I explain how the difference of one square number to another is easily graphed by adding 2 to the previous differenceAm I dumb? I can't understand this at all
>>16936627Aren't you that faggot who was arguing with himself for like two and a half years?
>>16936902Ignore him, he is a pretty well-known troll
>>16936902The Geometric side length remain proportional as comparitive to the original 3x4x5 triangle would have it gettng smaller, Im highly interested in its propotion numbers. If you were stuck on the integer definition youre not a Pythagorean, youre a "muggle" of some kind and cannot be invited to my holy sites or read my records.How did I know what field you DONT have a degree in?...its Number Theory.t.Number Theory
>>16937018>PythagoreanI wondered what the anti-bean coot would think if I showed him this...then I remembered they did spherical works, I can only do a couple things with that.Spherical Geometry is a lost art, its about perspective, not the shape per se, and it has a pi proportioned curve which is natural down to the cellular level with division, literallly, and thats why its Pi, and not Tau, because the "you" from either can only take half each.Cellular Cognition (rudimentary Organelle Cognition ).
>>16937020>its Pi, and not TauThe Man way to make Tau is to make a Hyper-Sphere for two Pi's.>>16936563>"inference">>16936569>n-Dimensional Geometry>Is "constructed" internallyGrading the work is your job...if youre an adult and need "commanding" to keep honest with even yourself you need God.
>>16937021>Grading the work is your jobYou have earned an F, 5% because you put your name on the page, next time, study more and bullshit less
>>16937025>Ha, well, I grade the work only you can sense...heh, and I say it stinks!Making up shit and see what sticks is what all the primates do when trying to figure something out.Cringe tryhard posting about anything but the topics.
>>16935953>Have you ever discovered anything novel in math or science?Try to reverse engineer unknown equations/phenomena, before looking it up. Rights, alternatives, wrongs. >>16935955>I have discovered>while mowing lawnsThe odds are actually in your favor, only problem is is if it had been invented it could files under some last name, but also an alternative again.Having multiple "measurements" gives lots of perspectives of whatever "unit" "it" is. Combinatorics Number Theory merged well into it for hierarchical structure "scaffolding", converted later into "Hilbert Space" (Dimensions/vectors thereof).
>>16937087>Having multiple "measurements"Eric Weinstein says "rulers and protractors", which yeah...straightline and compass, and in ancient statues its a ring (circular Geometry) and a rod (straighline). Polarity, orthogonal, are really foundational and applicable at all scales of life.Measuring direct distance and "projective outward?"? Trying to extrapolate higher Dimensions from 2-D. Like "doubling cube problem".
>>16935953>Have you ever discovered anything novel in math or science?Its talking about PLVS VLTRA, and that "secret university" would be a bunch of what you would call "schizos" but are also savants who cracked some code or algorithm mentally.Ive met one in person, some post from time to time, each one knew of some "discovery" that if applied at exactly the right way can cause untold chaos globally.
>>16935953I have discovered arithmetic, kneel before me
